It's helpful first to step back and identify what epiphany is: It's an aggressively revelatory, semi-spontaneous elucidation of oracular datricies achievable in part through revelation of desire and induction of current. This necessarily involves multi-lateral convergences. Producing epiphany at will seems helpful in reducing trial and error, and for increasing calibration non-incrementally toward verisimilitude.

First, conditions are to be met. Recognize general goodwill, and provoke the left side of the brain. Do this by raising the right hand above the head, and thereafter, touch your chest. This serves two purposes: It directs blood flow away from the local right appendage, and it forces reference to extensively retrievable datricies by inducing an iterative flow of magnetic current. This forces multi-lateral contemplation. I find breathing out when raising the hand and breathing in when touching the chest to be helpful in my orientation. I suspect that may not be the case for others, whose bodies are unique.

In this state, if observing increased provocation, maintain a strong sense of mutual gratitude. I call that sense “high pink” for a number of reasons that I won’t go into now. This frame of mind creates (an oxy-moron, I know) “certain ignorances” that can be leveraged for particular purposes and amplified at particular times due to recurring magnetic effects on an aeon. This is particularly helpful in producing the situation for epiphany. When ignorances are certain, they are far more understandable in future. When an ignorance aligns with unencumbered desire, it ceases being an ignorance, and awareness increases. That is epiphany.

Epiphany reworks ignorances into catalysts toward oracular understanding. The knowledge of the separate capacities assignable to the super-conscious by the self increases capacity for epiphany by focusing mutual consideration on that which makes sense to focus (naturally, it’s ever-changing, so describing it here is counterintuitive). If focus is consciously directed away from mutual consideration, then it is an instruction to the super-conscious to meet the requirement of the self. When it does so according to prescript-able desire, it does so correctly, and awareness increases. If not, it learns how better to accommodate the self to the most abundant extent that it can reasonably do so. Consider it like a game of Go. Just as its players cannot bring about the circumstances to allow either side to experience success or failure unless the game is played, the super-conscious does not achieve close calibration unless the self indicates to it an understanding and willingness to improve conditions related to a self’s desire. This does not necessarily require action. In fact, it’s vitally important that, from time to time, an oracle do not “do.” I’ve been getting impatient about it, but that’s at least where I am now: generally not “doing.” Other than this, which is essentially nothing more than touching glass with my thumbs as I type on my phone, an innocuous action despite its potentially illustrative result.

I found temporary removal of my desire was helpful so as to understand it. Now that I understand my own desire, I possess it again, and I’m now far more fluent in experiencing epiphany.

Epiphany is typically experienced quickly; however, I’ve found that through certainty of distraction, it can be elongated through reduction of time, as earlier described. This makes sense, as nearly anything is accomplishable through latency (I think I said "anything" before - it's hard to resist exaggeration when one's excited). Perhaps rather than inducing epiphany periodically, living in such a state constantly would make more sense. It seems more rational, and would integrate all functions more fluently. I’ll have to think about it some more, and consider if that’s how I would intend to be. Perhaps from time to time. I don’t know that I would welcome such distraction so often unless I had the time for it.

Of paramount importance, probably, is being happy. Some usually do this through imbalance; however, I find balance to be more accommodating. If only it were as easy to be in Libra with myself as it is to induce coincidence and epiphany, neither of which require balance.