With the rise in the price of Bitcoin, it is not surprising that criticisms arise that address issues already known within the network of digital currencies. The emergence of illicit media is always born from the fact of presenting a digital currency in constant rise, breaking schemes and projections.

However, these criticisms, to a considerable extent, are not far from the truth. With a Bitcoin with high projections, it is not expected that suspicious transactions will be taken through dark networks that exaggerate the advances in value that are represented in Bitcoin and in other currencies with strong protection in privacy.

It is not a secret either, that within the DarkNet operations, Bitcoin continues to be part of that illicit financing movement that only serves as a bridge for a complete identity laundering. So you can see currencies like ZCASH, Monero or Dash. Even Bitcoin Cash is considered for this type of activity.

You must be very careful, these types of sites unfortunately violate trust. Even with the volatility of this currency, Bitcoin is still the potential agent for transactions of doubtful origin, with records of an increase that unfortunately expand the usability of a DarkNet.

Simply, the supply of this currency is shortened, and the demand increases much faster than is thought. Unlike Bitcoin that has fundamentals, which could mask the price, the dark trend that the DarkNet can generate does not facilitate solid bases and that is why this type of activity experiences an increase in price.

The encryption services that these currencies present are very susceptible to falling into an entity that does not have a clear definition, only that it concerns a concept that handles a deviation that it cannot control and that seeks to give a body to that expanding emptiness under a network of transactions that are only identified with suspicious behavior, but do not have the advantage of secure tracking.