NWON - In a troubling series of articles and statements by undisputed, until now, experts in the field of medicine, questioning covid policies, the inability to find a clear study of a clinically isolated SARS-2 virus, comes to light. The latest article is this one.
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
New Zealand (Michael S.) and I (CM) have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
In this report, a number if various doctors questioning the conclusions of government health administrators, due to the failure to end lockdowns and curb the virus, come to light. Measures affecting public health, around the of fear of the out of control virus, led the experts on a search for the isolated virus, from which to conduct research and analysis, which would deepen our understanding and lead to more successful and practical public health measures.
In a paper published on his web site titled,
Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI),
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, along with Dr. Thomas Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell, MA. write the following
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
Government Experts Offer No Open Debate Or Scientific Proof Rebuttal
The team gathered hundreds of papers from leading government and private sources and none had any peer review clinical proof of an isolated virus or confirmation of a direct link to symptoms connected to isolated SARS-2 samples, or covid variants such as CoVid-19. In the public arena, government experts in the MSM, merely dismiss opposing ideas but produce no peer review research to counter their critics and ease the public.
The CDC is exampled in this report.
"On March 1, 2021 once again the CDC made clear that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible."
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CDC-March-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf
Read It all, published on ;
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
To say that that all government experts and even government policy critics in the medical and science field agree about isolation would be an overstatement.
SARS-2 Symptoms of Unsettled Science
The covid debate is ongoing. Even recent critics of the mass vaccine policy and lockdown measures like former Pfizer, research VP Michael Yeadon and GAVI researcher Geert Vanden Bossche, maintain that the SARS-2 virus has been isolated and photographed, under an electron microscope then tested. However they do not avow that isolation under a microscope has been successful in the case of the other, many SARS-2 variants such as CoVid-19.
Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President: Vaccine Passports Are Population Control Not Medicine
The photo above is from an article by;
ABOVE: The SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus (yellow), isolated from a patient, emerges from cultured cells (blue and pink).
NIAID-RML
Image of the Day: Coronavirus Under the Scope
New scanning and transmission electron microscope images of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus taken at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Rocky Mountain Laboratories show the virus’s similarities to the viruses that caused a MERS outbreak in 2012 and a SARS outbreak in 2002, according to a NIAID blog post.
So is it, or is it not isolated?
Clinical Isolation and Photographic Identification
Pharmaceutical researchers such as Yeadon and Vanden Bossche, argue that if you see the virus, under a microscope in the sample, any commonly identified identical symptoms are a result of the virus. However, medical researchers such as doctors Kaufman, Cowan, and Morell argue, that you cannot inject an electron microscope photo into a test patient. You must introduce a provably isolated substance, that actively contains only the virus, without allowing contaminants into the cultured cells, then introduced into the test subject. They argue, no research paper confirming this clinical, as opposed to photographic, isolation, has been proven in a clear, duplicatable study yet produced.
A Reader Resource
This Government expert site link has a lot of studies you can look through for a deeper dig into their thinking on virology.. I wonder however what virology has to do with the religion surrounding the belief in what is termed "Structural Racism". Is government science, becoming political/religious science?
Welcome to NCBI
The National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science and health by providing access to biomedical and genomic information.
