Without the constitutional authority stipulated under law, the senate and president, under the banners of the parties, both seem eager to drive seditious impeachment with a small i, to a vote.
Seditious impeachment Is Not Constitutional Impeachment
The process in the Intelligence committee is not lawful under government authority. It is a private political matter, defined as a thing in government. Under law, all things in government with legal authority, must follow the legal process to have the authority under law. Otherwise it is sedition.
This should be obvious. I cannot understand why this is not being discussed. It is the fundamental issue. No body organized under the Constitution may violate the rights of Citizens in carrying out the functions of that body under the Constitution.
Party Leaders,Talk Show Hosts And Media Take Notice
Anyone who advocates for a U.S. Senate trial, based on this seditions process owns the results of throwing away the Constitutional authority of the People. A full hearing with all evidence and witnesses, required under the Constitution, that affirms a vote of Impeachment, is then Impeachment and is duly authorized by the People, under their authority in law.
At this point, the only trial in the Senate obligated under the Constitution is a trial of the House members who are attempting to overstep their obligations of power under the Constitution.
Seditious impeachment: Justification, Criminal Violations
Other than the part about the House conducting Impeachment inquiries which you can look up, this is the other justification.
It involves the secret way in which the current Intelligence Committee and the Speaker are conducting their self described and media affirmed impeachment. Here is a Fox news analysis from today. Party power politics at it’s finest.
In Trump impeachment trial, Senate Republicans could turn tables on Dems
Political Party and Media Justification
Section 5
2: Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.
However committee use of power, denying compelling witnesses their right and obligation to testify, under threat of penalty, violates the People’s rights under the Constitution. It is in direct violation of the fourth and fifth articles of the Constitution.
Case for Cease and Desist Under Threat of Indictment
Pretty simple. Anything done under the authority of the government must comply with the rights and process of the Constitution. Yet the Intelligence Committee is granting itself rights over the rights of the citizens it wishes to inquire about.
Legislative bodies can form committees to inquire about anything. They can invite testimony of anyone. They can compel testimony based on any device that occurs to them. But they cannot compel testimony or evidence under penalty of law, without evidence of a crime, that can be potentially proven in a court of law. Testimony allows questions to possibly be resolved under congressional authority, without, or with lessened, legal action required and then applied to legislation.
Legal action for seizure of evidence and forcing testimony then follows these guidelines.
Article [IV] (Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure)
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
So Where’s the Beef?
In other words. If they have no evidence of a crime, then under what authority are they suggesting penalties for crimes against those who refuse to appear? They are in effect, signalling to the judicial and Justice Department, that they expect them to prosecute crimes they designate as violating their committee process, even if it violates a citizen’s rights under the Constitution.
These are the rights of persons under law.
Article [V] (Amendment 5 - Rights of Persons)
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, (a process where all evidence is introduced (editor)), except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Then there s this
Article VI (Article 6 - Prior Debts, National Supremacy, Oaths of Office)
2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing* in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
*Impeachment, committee rules, inquires for legislative purposes, are all Things allowed in the constitution.
3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;
The Committee Operates Outside Of Clearly Defined Mandates
The laws of the land then cannot violate this process or they are unauthorized as law.
The right of the legislature to conduct themselves as they need, would be defined as a Thing in the Constitution, the results of which, cannot override the framework of protections in the Constitution of the People from Government.
It is here;
...the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; ... under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any THING in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Current Intelligence Committee Edicts Violate Oath Of Office
At the very least they’re is evidence of violations of oath of office. Current rules laid out by the Intelligence committee do not allow for all evidence to be submitted for questioning as authorized under law. When you get the various corporate medias’ message of this illegal process, it is reported as an arbitrary consideration to score political points, that has no bearing over House procedures.
The process governs the authority for House procedures, in regards to legal action over all citizen rights. That is, no one person or body in government, has authority to compel violations of due process rights, unless in times of war and such as you read in the Articles and amendments.
CHALLENGES OBLIGATIONS AND AUTHORITY OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES
The House is obligated to a full and open hearing to decide impeachment. Only if voted under this process, can an Impeachment trial be considered in the Senate, or participated in and advocated for, by the President.
The Senate is obligated to investigate the House and call all witnesses and introduce all evidence available, in order to clarify House actions immediately.
Any attempt to advance this current State Department and international intelligence community, political operation product, packaged as Impeachment, is seditious impeachment fraud against the People, their rights, and their Constitutionally authorized government
Challenges, Electoral Obligations and Authority Of The People
Since WWII the People have voted in a more international oriented government, in order to create a world order, to end world wars. This has worked in many ways. As a result, the government over time has developed a theme of cultural inclusive, multiculturalism, to define American values to the world.
e plu·ri·bus u·num
In domestic affairs, instead of e luribus unum, /ˌē ˌplo͝orəbəs ˈ(y)o͞onəm/
noun
- out of many, one (the motto of the US),
anti constitutional elements have popularized this to mean the one transforming itself into many purposes and identities.
Read Part 2 in the full article on
