Usually you check the reviews to get some answers on something you're not too familiar with. I was searching for something completely different in a search engine and then I found this review page on Publish0x which I clicked on just for fun to see what people had to say. It somehow left me with questions I didn't realize I had.🤣

Maybe that's because I already have 5 years of experience here because if I didn't, I would be cautions on joining based on the score alone. And let's face it, most people don't really read through everything and want all the answers in a quick easy to read summary like these scores. So you'd better be damn sure that how you calculate it is fair and accurate, especially when it's regarding crypto and all the caution people have due to all the bad actors.

So after reading through all the reviews and figuring out how Trustpilot calculates this score I can 100% say it is by no means fair nor accurate. And to make matters actually worse, Trustpilot themselves put a "high risk investment" label on top of the review.

There are so many inconsistencies in the claims people make but the bigger issue is that just some quick basic math would make you wonder how approximately 50% 5 star reviews and 45% 1 star reviews can lead to a 1.5 score.

Well that's because they weigh more recent reviews heavier than older reviews, and after checking the dates it is indeed accurate that most of the negative reviews are from the past 2 years. Like the latest one from garumi:

"A lot of downright bad advice...good articles are few and far between" you say? Well that's because you haven't checked out this blog here my mans, that's 100% on you.

Also not sure what you mean with "pittance", you want free coins with zero investment then this is the place, if you want to hit it big then you should be joining new projects trying to get airdrops or start farming. You know, places where that "high risk investment" warning would actually be applicable. So in conclusion: Who would have guessed nothing comes easy, the more you want, the more you have to risk.

Next up Anon:

Right off the bat: Pure 🐎 💩 What do you mean "you think in +2 years at one point you were able to withdraw?"

I'd like to challenge that by asking anyone who has been using this site for 2 years without trying a single payout to come forward. That was the first thing I did within the first 2 months. I actually remember it vividly because that was the part that verified to me it was legit. I also remember what he talks about regarding the reorg of cryptos they pay out with, but that didn't mean they "removed" the balance, it was just converted into the other adapted cryptos.

I know I'm mostly preaching to the choir here but you've got to remember, you are reading these reviews without any practical knowledge on any of this. All these claims about refusing payouts and removing balances would seem quite plausible to the outside world when it comes to crypto.

Ohh wow, "the biggest scam of all time" no less huh? How you even expect me to take this serious? Not Bernard Madoff Investment Securities, not Enron, not Bitconnect, not FTX, not Wirecard no, Publish0x is "the biggest scam." A place that requests 0.00 investment from you and all they ask is to do your own writing without the use of AI. Pfff the audacity of the scammers.😂

"you work for free or at best a few cents, making a millionaire out of a guy who drives around in a new Ferrari." Wait now I do feel scammed, I thought I was the only one here who drove around in a Ferrari from my publish0x earnings.🤣

Ohh yeah, I completely forgot about the Kucoin era. But just to show what a reasonable and accurate review looks like.

And in closing a critical honest review, which if you read carefully you'll pretty much understand the reasons for most of the negative reviews:

I haven't been using AI, don't have other accounts and never cared to copy other people's 🐄💩 so I never encountered any of these issues most negative reviewers have. And that's the bottom line I think, most people don't have the patience or interest to build something up and want quick results, so they try to get clever. When it backfires, they try to get clever on these review sites.

Now to be fair, I'm not saying some people might not be wronged. Nothing is perfect and sometimes honest genuine accounts get restricted without justifiable reasons. But that is not really a crypto platform problem, go ask Youtube how many accounts they reinstate after being wrongfully banned or demonized.

The bottom line is there is a lot more fairness and actual human interaction here than most other platforms. On Youtube you can not even get a human response and even +1 million subscriber accounts have to reach out to Youtube on Twitter by making their case trending and cited enough times for Youtube to see it. That is ****** ridiculous.

I'm pretty sure that in recent years since AI came along, Twitter itself doesn't even have an actual human being reviewing your messages or appeals regarding Tweets and most human contact you get is in the very last appeal step when your account gets suspended. Something that has been happening a lot lately despite the verbal diarrhea Pedon Musk promised about "fairness."

Now let's compare their horrendous scores with over 90% 1 star reviews to that of publish0x shall we: