A CONSPIRACY DOES NOT EXIST

Those who do not know the meaning of conspiracy only need to know a crime has been committed. If a crime is committed by one person, and one person only this is not a conspiracy, it is a lone wolf, who committed the crime. If a crime is committed by two or more persons, these persons conspired to commit a crime, this is a conspiracy to commit one or more crimes.

Every crime, how seemingly they look, is different. So "a theory" does not exist, the general term "conspiracy theory" always needs to refer to a specific crime. That specific crime can be committed by one person, a lone wolf, or two or more, a conspiracy.

So when debunkers by profession try to ridicule investigators of crimes by calling them conspiracy theorists, the debunkers themselves NEED to explain why THEY think this crime was not perpetrated by multiple persons. The debunkers want the whole world to believe NO ONE ELSE WAS INVOLVED in the crime than the one person, that the government or officials say, did it. In the 9/11 case, the government made sure we pointed the finger at one person. But everybody also saw the facials of the alleged hijackers. THIS WAS A CONSPIRACY BY DEFINITION, with multiple crimes, and multiple perpetrators. They took the programming of the public to a much higher level than they did in 1967, they had done more studies and experiments on human perception, the susceptibility of the human brain, MK ULTRA, and MK NAOMI were/are very real. The whole world focussed on Bin Laden, and almost everything else was blurred out, or put in with CGI. The footage of hundreds of camera's around the Pentagon, did anyone see hundreds of videos replayed from all angles, over and over again? Did someone notice they talked about the collapse of Building 7 on the BBC, with Building 7 standing in one piece in the background? The script was transmitted too early, and half an hour later Building 7 collapsed exactly the way the BBC reporter had reported a half hour earlier.

By definition, if there is a script, there is propaganda, and there are media, sometimes fooled, sometimes paid, to do the mind-programming repetition of one-liners, it is multiple criminals, it is a conspiracy. But still, people who are 100% certain, the planes were CGI-ed later by specialized movie studios, do not trust what they saw in reality, as a witness. Statements from eyewitnesses changed after they had watched it all on television. Some witnesses disappeared. Some experts were murdered! That could not all be done by Bin Laden alone. Multiple psychopaths were in on this, a conspiracy. And the evidence leads us to the "Patriot Act" (De USA PATRIOT Act, backronym voor Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001). Evidence is not a theory, evidence can get people in jail, but theories do not.

So do not focus on the "Conspiracy Theory", but the evidence, and proof in court that you can still get these murderers in jail. This can be done step by step, you do not need a whole theory, just focus on one piece of the complex crime at one time. Prosecutors will notice if they can convict one main accomplice before he/she gets "suicided", it will have a snowball effect, and the conspiracy will be solved, it will be proven that the powerful families in charge wanted the Patriot Act in place. It means more power, more arrogance, and a reason to wage war, all over the planet, on states that are run by local dictators who are still not impressed by "the USA". War has been a business model for many centuries (and most criminal acts during the war are not prosecuted, during any war you can "safely and effectively" conspire until you get tired of being called evil, a terrorist, a criminal, and a murderer yourself). 

Pay close attention, when investigators want to solve a crime, they try to find EVIDENCE; fingerprints, tools, phone records, witnesses, letters, e-mails, assurance records, medical records, blood type, camera footage, you name it. And when the evidence is overwhelming pointing in the direction of multiple perpetrators, for this case and this case only, they formulate a theory based on the evidence, to make the evidence usable in a court of law AS PROOF.

In a good conspiracy, the scapegoat (lone wolf) often does not make it to the court, or first hearing. Crimes committed by the government, or agencies, rarely end up in court. They end up covered. A part of the covering is the ridiculing of investigators, attacking the social, economic, or professional life, and family, or even eliminating those who know or discovered too much about certain conspiracies.

When 'officials' want to blame a crime on ONE PERSON, they PLANT the evidence and present that evidence as fast as they can so they program the public into believing the theory of the government that was ALSO planned in front. When government officials accused or blamed only ONE PERSON, and keep repeating the name a thousand times, YOU CAN BE 99,99% SURE this crime was committed by multiple persons, and if this crime was committed by MULTIPLE PERSONS, it was a conspiracy, but the government wants the whole world to believe it was a lone wolf.

So 9/11 WAS a conspiracy, multiple crimes, multiple persons involved (even if B.L. was involved, he could not fly all planes by himself), which means 100% sure Bin Laden could not do that alone! And if you look a the evidence, f.e. the towers and building seven being pulled, by pulverization and demolition, you know this was not Bin Laden, but a highly advanced military operation, using the latest techniques to create a false flag. False Flags are always crimes committed by multiple people, so always a conspiracy.

The effort in ridiculing the "conspiracy theorist" started in 1967. 

The gaslighting of the so-called "conspiracy theorists" started after the "assassination" of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, in Dallas, on November 22, 1963. In 1967 the Warren Report sketched the most ridiculous theories (like turning bullets), and tried to make the world believe LEE HARVEY OSWALD was a "lone wolf". But they forgot to explain, just like the collapse of building 7 on 9/11, why the look-alike of JFK, Officer Tippit, was also shot and killed that day and time in Dallas, and why the photos of the dead bodies in the morgue got mixed up. In 1967 those who did not buy the 'lone wolf' story were called "conspiracy theorists" (the CIA started to call people that), it was meant to shut them down and ridicule them. All (overwhelming) evidence that proved there were multiple persons involved in the crime event, was dismissed or covered because they disproved the official 'lone wolf' theory.

Next time you hear an official (or noob) call someone a "conspiracy theorist", know that they DO NOT DISAGREE with the fact that a crime or crimes have been committed. The 'lone wolf' theorist however is paid to 'protect' those who were accomplices to the crime, that was committed by multiple persons: a conspiracy.

addendum April 6, 2026 Watch the whole video! but ~ 1h 47m he'll explain, and proof my point.

An observation: The more officials try to ridicule the conspiracy behind a certain crime and want to keep the story simple by giving the most far-fetched, or physically impossible explanations, the more you can be sure that the crime has been well organized, planned in front, and executed with military precision. Most conspiracies serve an agenda. So in most cases, if you know the public-, but more importantly, the hidden agenda, you can easier form a theory, and even predict what crime(s) are going to be committed next, and more importantly, under what cover and by whom.

If you still think 9/11 was done by Bin Laden only, or Lee Harvey killed JFK on his own (and Tippit on the fly), and you still believe all physical anomalies are not waving a red flag in your direction, then this is what you are, a believer. You probably mistake your beliefs for knowledge, or you get paid to protect the criminals, in that case, you know it's a conspiracy (you are number two now at least) and you are now an accomplish by trying to obscure or withhold evidence of a crime, or crimes. If it is your job to withhold evidence or ridicule those who have investigated the crime (scene) and found evidence, then you really need to ask yourself what you are doing, is money so important to you, fame, or the appreciation from psychopaths?

99% OF ALL WORLD SHOCKING CRIMES WERE CONSPIRACIES, EVERY CONSPIRACY HAS ITS SEPARATE EVIDENCE THAT CAN PROVE A CERTAIN THEORY. Every theory is different therefore A CONSPIRACY THEORY does NOT EXCIST.

Conspiracies have nothing to do with facts, cause facts are just facts, if it's not a fact then stating it as a fact is a false statement. Conspiracies are built on logic, explanation, evidence, and proof. A crime must be proved in court, which is done by evidence and (sometimes a new) theory (like a new technique was used to pulverize the buildings on 9/11). New techniques are not publicly available and are kept secret for a very long time, and thus ridiculed as false (opposite of factual) information for a long time.

It is a fact that prosecutors always look for more accomplishes in every crime. This makes them conspiracy-minded. And when it's obvious, f.e. example when a bank robbery was done by three robbers, and a get-away driver, the prosecutor knows this was a conspiracy and will try to get all four conspirers convicted based on the evidence, and NOT based on the fact that most robberies are done by four men.

If you still trust your government, news channels, and papers, you probably are the perfect lone wolf when you find out that you have been fooled all your life.

Always keep in mind; Conspiracy means Crime(s) Committed by two or more, that is all!

A conspiracy must be proven, by explanation, logic, and evidence. Every theory behind every crime is different, that's why "a" conspiracy does not exist. Those who try to ridicule others (those who push the lone wolf narrative) by calling them conspiracy theorists are mostly professional trolls paid by governments, or organized criminal organizations, which are fully intertwined! By definition, if people get ridiculed by calling them conspiracy theorists, the crimes the ridiculed try to prove, are mostly crimes perpetrated by more than one (conspiracies). A "lone wolf" criminal does not have the power, nor the means to ridicule anyone who tries to prove the crime. The officers of the law that imprison people for being conspiracy theorists are full-blown corrupt criminals working for the criminal organization (your governments) being only busy covering up all the crimes. Universal law; No deeds are unseen, all deeds are recorded.

Many (complex) conspiracies will never be proven, by lack of evidence, even if the theories were very accurate and gave a more logical explanation than the official narrative and explanation.

Those who cover up crimes are (above the) government level, they have many ways to "erase tracks", mostly in plain sight.

The corruption of the words "conspiracy theory" is an example of an incorrect contradiction of two concepts. While both sides before 1967 knew a crime had been committed, and both sides' main goal was to catch (all) the criminal(s). After the term "conspiracy theorist" was "invented" both sides were led to believe the lone wolf narrative and those who did not believe that were ridiculed. The discussion (public investigation) was led away from the real crime and criminals involved, and only the lone wolf camp was allowed to give an opinion, while those who knew there were more criminals involved were silenced, ridiculed, and stigmatized. This is one of many divide-and-conquer tactics by government agencies put on the public.

Maybe it's time we all realize that the real meaning of conspiring is "breathe together".

Inspiring "with every breath you take".

Respiring "Breath again"

Spirit "Breathe"

So breathe pure air, and make your government stop polluting the air above us.

Spraying (toxic) Berium, Strontium, and Aluminum is criminal.

It is part of Geoengineering, which is based on 99% false assumptions.

Since this is not done by one person, the toxification of the air is a conspiracy, a criminal act allowed and executed by multiple persons.

The Geoengineering theory is not a Conspiracy theory, we do not need to know why THE CRIMINALS are doing this, but we need to collect evidence of these criminal acts. Once we found proof that the toxins are killing us, by lab tests, we can ACCUSE ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL that is allowing this to happen. 

Geoengineering is not a conspiracy theory but probably a geoengineering theory that explains why they are conspiring to smother us, by smothering the atmosphere with the most poisonous chemicals and elements. If people believe this is not happening, just look up at the sky on a sunny day. If you did not see it that is not because it does not exist, you can read that article here.

If you want to educate yourself please visit "The End Of Covid" 

This video is only to demonstrate there are unnumerable conspiracies. Most conspiracies never are fully understood or explained. But to attack and ridicule people for being "conspiracy theorists" is another crime from governments to the people. In other words; "just because you think you are being followed and watched, doesn't mean you are paranoid". (And those who watch and follow everyone like to call their "objects" paranoid).