1/3/2017 Tuesday, Day - 1717 days before President Obama left office, he changed existing rules to make NSA surveillance information available to all agencies, which means 16 other agencies. There are very good reasons for compartmentalization, like making sure that information doesn’t get weaponized.
These agencies are run by appointees they are not elected by the public. All of us have our own opinions and objectives and this flaw in the system, created by Barack Obama, leaves not only the possibility for corruption and exploitation of our national security but instead it has led to the likelihood of it occurring.
If Obama did this for the protection of our nation why was it not done earlier instead of 17 days before he left office? Why did former President Obama keep such tight controls on information while in office when he ran calling on transparency and then suddenly empower unelected officials in our intelligence agencies? Because he was silently encouraging discourse and sedition within the government.
Obama also raided the DNC and left them hurting before he left office leaving Hillary Clinton as the only democratic candidate that could really bail them out but campaigns run on money, personality, and promises. Although Clinton bought the DNC she still couldn’t get elected and Obama had to take action while he could and he knew how to do it. He’d already weaponized the Justice Department and intelligence agencies just needed to integrate his team of unseen deep state warriors before he left. It’s a lasting gift that just keeps giving.
The democrat party and their media surrogates say that they couldn’t get the messaging right during the 2016 campaign but Hillary couldn’t sell the message even if people wanted the warped socialist ideology pushed by the left. As a first lady she smiled but as a candidate in the 2016 campaign she was consistently angry and yelling in a hoarse voice into the microphones and stabbing her little politically correct thumb at people. On top of that Hillary wasn’t really even doing any hard core interviews or answering real questions unless the questions were pre-approved. Well, I guess there were appearances on Ellen and on The View.
Good old Uncle Bernie was the better spokesman and was at least a bit more honest with who he was instead of trying to sell people a secret, something they had to vote for first in order to see it outside the fog of controversy. So what’s in it for the left wing media and why did they still support Clinton over Sanders? Answer, they’re the big corporations and their parent companies all have their own objectives. Look them up, you might look at them a whole new way if you’re willing to look far enough.
Which leads us back to the topic of compromise which Hillary Clinton may never have understood until the reality check of not being popular despite having collected and redistributed funds to all the right people. Everyone wants to be popular right? We all know that the sheep always vote for the cool people.
My point is that President Obama was very well aware of who Hillary was and what their common objectives were. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Both Obama and Clinton seek to change the United States into “America”, a vast free trade open borders society with cheap labor, and their objectives include capturing one or both of the political parties of our nation. As you can see they’ve certainly made some of that progress they always talk about in both parties. Look at John McCain. Their idea of progress however is to reverse our declarations of independence and freedom from tyranny in order to make all people subservient while they run the economy, collect taxes, and write new laws for the new world order they wish to create. That’s not what democracy looks like despite what their signs say.
1/8/2017 Wednesday, -11
Rep. Adam Smith (D) Washington State, Ranking member of Armed Services Committee, when confronted with the cost of Obama care states that constituents are opposed to budgetary restraint!
I live in Washington State and can assure you that I’ve never heard any of my neighbors make that claim. Quite the contrary, we are horribly over taxed and probably the highest taxed in the nation. He’s either a liar or out of touch with reality.
It's his JOB to make sure we're not bankrupt and incidentally, he's the ranking member on the Armed Services Committee so he should understand the risk of being in debt to your competitors and enemies. I’m curious as to his voting record on military spending. Send this guy a message.
Also right about this time the CIA left is left without leadership. Just like that eh?
1/10/2017 Tuesday Day – 10
The South Carolina Department of Revenue says the owner of the Obama Store and gas station in Columbia, S.C., filed $971,935 in sales tax returns in the period between 2013 and 2016. That was a bit inaccurate and now the owner of the Obama Store and gas station, 39 year old Murad A. Alhanik, has been arrested, charged with 4 counts of sales tax evasion, and booked, after an agency investigation found the store’s sales was actually $2.6 million.
Alhanik cheated us out of more than $136,000 in sales taxes during that four year period. Yes I said us, the citizens of the United States, the other people that pay taxes to keep our nation safe and prosperous. Alhanik could face up to five years in prison and fines nearing $10,000. And of course there’s still that $136,000+ that’s long overdue. Alhanik said he’d never change the name of the store even though Obama isn’t president anymore because “it’s still history.” Aptly named both Obama and his namesake store cheated the American people and neither seem to regret it.
Want to know something interesting? The above story, dated January 10, 2017, won’t show up on the FOX News website until exactly a year from today!
I still had to throw it in since it’s an example of how the news is filtered, manipulated, and recycled. It took a year for this rather unimportant but politically humorous story to come out and it would have been better to run it when it was current than to bury it for a year and throw it out as if it were a current event a year later. Do they save these stories like change in a jar for a rainy day? Or maybe a sick day?
1/14/2017 Saturday, Day - 6
On January 22, 2009 President Obama fulfilled his campaign pledge by issued a directive that ordered the closure of Guantánamo within one year and ordering a review of ways to transfer detainees to the United States for imprisonment or trial. But congressional leaders didn't want the detainees to be released and rejected Obama's plan to transfer them to prisons in the U.S. Republicans, and some Democrats, argued that housing the detainees in prisons on U.S. soil would be a national security concern.
Obama has hammered away at this issue by saying that Guantanamo is being used as a recruiting tool for ISIS. It seems quite dangerous, or devious, to place these well-known enemy combatants in U.S. prisons were they can recruit new members from within the criminal system who may later be released here in our own country after being trained, housed, and fed on the U.S. tax dollar. Unbelievable that this action alone wasn't enough to throw huge doubts and concerns regarding the competence and intentions of the president towards our nation, which as I recall, he had said needed to be fundamentally changed.
Five more detainees, all Yemenis, are being released from Guantanamo. Four will go to Oman and one to Estonia. Over the past year, 28 detainees have been transferred out of the prison. This leaves 122 battlefield detainees still being held at Guantanamo, ten of them are facing criminal charges including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.
In early 2002 Guantanamo began housing members of al-Qaeda which was responsible for the September 11, 2001 attacks and the Taliban which was the Islamic fundamentalist faction that had ruled Afghanistan between 1996 and 2001. The Bush administration maintained that since the base was outside U.S. territory it was not obligated to provide constitutional protections to prisoners nor were they required to observe the Geneva Convention regarding the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in a time of war and pointed out that they were “unlawful enemy combatants” and not soldiers of any nations military. Perhaps that's why Obama wanted to set them free, he may recognize ISIS, I mean ISIL, or more to the point, the Islamic State as a legitimate. That sure would explain a lot.
In 2008, after a bit of arguing the Supreme Court, in Boumediene v. Bush ruled that foreign detainees had the right to challenge their detentions in the federal courts. And that my friends is why when at war you keep it on the battlefield, then you don't have to keep feed and house the enemy while living in fear of them.
1/19/2017 Thursday, -1
Protests were held outside the National Press Building in Washington D.C. where the DeploraBall was held. Although mostly peaceful debris was thrown and police responded with tear gas and pepper spray.
