AI has seen a lot of traction lately, with it's implementation in almost every field of life.
It has also made humans more lazy and more dependent on it for even writing a simple application letter or curriculum vitae.
Many people are baffled by the creative work of ai in putting pieces of other people's work together and make some different.
It is said that if you copy one person's work, you plagiarize, but if you copy from different people, it is a research, but is AI actually a researcher or a thief.
When AI copies from different sources or scraps images from sources on the web, it most times fails to give references to the source.
Couldn't this be seen as stealing ?
If these works are stolen, can they be protected by copyright ?
The issue of copyright is a broad area plagued with uncertainty in AI. In the US, works generated solely by AI can not be protected by copyright, but if there is human input, it can be protected.
There is the saying, that articles are not written but rewritten, everything that you want to say has already been said, but since no body is listening it has to be said again.
But AI is stealing from human creativity and is not giving original content.
So how do you steal with AI profitably ?
Well, it is quite simple, you steal like an artist.
AI generated contents lack human skills and judgement in perfecting it's generated works.
It uses large language model to try to understand what you are prompting it to do, and other people's work without insights and references.
AI should not be used as a base for research, it is best use for generating outline, framework for an image or snippet of code.
Total dependency on AI works will make you as a creator lose taste in your work.
AI should be used to lay foundation on your ideas and build further on it, not build the complete structure on it.
Hope you learnt something today, I am ticktalker and I always post crypto/educative contents.
Be sure to follow me and turn on the notification, to see more of my articles.
