In history, everything is recorded in a way that, primarily, should be impartial, to let the reader decide whether the event, in their own judgment, is good or bad.
In practice, the narratives, whatever they are, will always be loaded with the writer's own impressions. In history, simply put, almost everything that is told usually depends on who won the war, the dispute, the point of view or any form of gain.
Hardly, until the end of the 20th century, with the advent of audiovisual media gaining visibility, the loser's version was told.
In the 21st century, then, versions of a story have multiplied after the citizen himself manages to record, edit and publish audiovisual, texts and media outside the large communication networks.
Finally, the citizen himself, today, can tell the story from his point of view.
Whether that's good or bad depends on who reads it. Whether it's right or wrong depends on who plays!
In the example of this article, from the Star Wars story, told from the rebels' point of view, obviously, Luke Skywalker's saga is one of someone who grows in knowledge, takes sides in conflict and "saves" the galaxy. It brings balance to strength, anyway.
But, as the text of the image says, this is how the people of the imperial government, of the populations who believe in the emperor, must have seen the news of the destruction of the original death star.
In this way, does it make you think, for example, that this would not be how the people who invaded the capitol saw when the congress would recognize Biden as president?
See, whoever wins, whoever loses loses, the democratic process, with rules and laws defined and accepted by all, recognizes the winner and the loser. Everyone must accept because everyone accepted the initial rules. It's part of the process.
On the contrary, in this electoral example, the non-acceptance leads to the thought: "I only have my version, the other side doesn't exist! And if I don't win, then everyone has deceived me!", like an angry child.
Funny, because when you win, you don't question, when you lose, you even question the way you won.
Anyway, what overcomes this kind of thinking is always the law.
But of course, the law depends, to be more than legality, the legitimacy conferred by who is below it: the people.
And each people has its law, what seems right for one people may not be right for another, because the regional culture defines the acceptability of laws.
The regulation of cryptocurrencies, which is transnational, will demand an international effort from the countries.
Here comes a problem: which countries will want to give up their thoughts, right or wrong, for global regulation?
To make matters worse, once this regulation is accepted, who will confer legitimacy on this regulation?
The war that breaks out at the beginning of the discussion about the London upgrade of the Ethereum network seems insignificant, but it carries a whole context.
On one side is the revolt of miners who have invested in hardware that will be lost. On that same side are several tokens created, because, after the update, it will be more difficult to apply moves tatno as to make legitimate tokens.
On the other side are those who think it's fair to pay less for better technology, who understand that if the system doesn't update itself, it will collapse and take the cryptocurrency system with it.
But isn't it like that in the digital world: everything happening quickly?
How many times have you updated the hardware in your life?
The problem is that without regulation, even the update is questioned, suggesting that many people will win and almost all miners will lose.
In fact, when the ethereum system started to be updated, it was widely publicized, it was very defined and, in an open way, in stages, everyone involved was notified.
Besides, how much have these miners already earned? I believe your systems have been paid and multiplied many times.
Anyway, the ethereum system is already in place and being used in large commercial systems.
Regulation, in any case, comes to calm and regulate things, bringing some order, in short, to the galaxy.
The balance of Force will finally be established.
like in the Star Wars story, when Yoda talks about the balance of power, he doesn't necessarily mean peacemaking. At that time, the Force was unbalanced: there were too many Jedi in that galaxy and they considered it a good thing.
At the end of the Star Wars story, there were none left, neither Sith nor Jedi. The balance finally came, but not as anyone imagined!
The balance in the cryptomeda system will, of course, come from no one giving up their gains or in a global median pact, in an unpredictable way.
This lack of consensus is present in the climate pact - which is affecting the world, warming the environment and killing flora and fauna -, in the pact for covid - now the richest protect their population, without understanding that the poorest are in the world , and if everyone does not protect themselves, no one in fact is protected -, in the Middle East pact - they kill, shallowly by religion, and deeply by the control of water and oil in the region, in the global financial and fiscal pact - where the balance of currencies, commodities and cryptocurrencies always take into account who earns the most first and ultimately in the pact for global 5G - where US and CHINA fight for global dominance over mass data telecommunications.
All this lack of consensus impacts on cryptocurrencies: evasion of good capital from business volume, loss of reliability and structure, over-regulation, leaving the system in a secondary stage, distrust in updates and restrictions on energy expenditure.
The cryptocurrency system is not out of this world!
The cryptcurrency system could revolutionize the world indeed!
But does it resist the world?
Any revolution must, in principle, protect its focus, which in this case is the investors and the people who can become investors!
Smoothness and transparency are already a form of regulation.
It is concluded, therefore, that the cryptocurrencies themselves can and should be seen in the same way as the image that illustrates this article.
This exercise usefully makes you understand where you are in the world.
This exercise of imagination can bring interesting reflections to "update" the thoughts of users of this great system.
Maturation never comes without pain or loss but brings in itself great wisdom and happiness!
Related articles:
https://www.publish0x.com/rationality-emotionality-and-financial-markets/freedom-and-economy-xmmkned
https://www.publish0x.com/rationality-emotionality-and-financial-markets/economy-and-life-xknkzlg
