Is It possible that governments and big pharma are collaborating to present a set of solutions to the "covid19 pandemic" that advantage them legally, administratively and on a commercial prospective?

I wonder wether beyond the virus, as a contagion, there are other forces at play that are not being addressed, because they are not advantageous to some of the aforementioned agencies?

Lisa Feldman Barrett, a professor of psychology at Northeastern University gives us some insight upon this:

She describes how there seems to be interest only on selected area of scientific discoveries, which appear to be chosen in order to maintain a specific paradigm, the adoption of this strong set of assumptions over this past year had obviously brought profits to only a few big companies and struggles to many.

During this pandemic a distorted and unscientific belief seem to have been established; the official guidelines given in the past year point (with no scientific evidence) to the fact that there is only one underlying immutable cause that makes people sick with the virus which is exposure to the virus. Hence the lockdown social distancing etc.. which are trying to limit exposure only, regardless of any other variable like who, why, how or when.

The faulty assumption widespread by media led most people to believe that the exposure to the covid19 virus is THE one and only cause of the respiratory illness. Normalising the implementation of lockdowns and isolation.

This distorted narrative doesn't apply to any infectious disease wether is the common flu or covid19.

The Lab Experiment

As mentioned by Dr Lisa Feldman Barrett, the experiment consisted in isolating human subjects in hotel rooms (like most quarantines are done, in UK, AU, NZ), and  monitoring how they slept, what they ate and all other variables.

Each subject was then swabbed up the nostrils with the exact same dose of virus (same level of exposure). The experiment resulted in 
only 20% to 40% of people getting sick with symptoms even though each of them had the same level of exposure to the virus.

So what were the predictors of the 20/40% who got sick:

-A history of adversity

-Chronic Stress (much alike the portion of humanity in strict lockdowns are undergoing)

We are often pinning those aspects to the psychological health dimension, but as demonstrated they have a very direct physical repercussion on the health of the immune system and Its ability to fight the virus.

The experiment also demonstrates how exposure to a virus is clearly not the same as infection from It.

Therefore being exposed to a virus is not THE cause of an illness, It is ONE necessary cause, but It is not THE cause.

Yet the official guidelines have only been focused on the realm of limiting exposure, which has been sold as the one and only most effective solution, which given the results after one year of implementation and no results clearly isn't let alone economically the most detrimental choice possible for most of the world population.

So Who Is profiting from this?

The system setup to deal with this pandemic seem to favour solutions which are benefitting the Big 3 Sectors, with the dirtiest track records and the usual giants we all know:
Big pharma with the worldwide vaccine sales having over 7 bilion costumers,
Big tech with their beloved track and trace solutions taking place worldwide increasing their controlling power and users daily given the isolating circumstances.
E commerce giants to name one Amazon with online shopping as the preferred way of buying groceries at loss of small local business.
This so called "solutions" seem to bring a lot of business to this giants

Is There a Better way to deal with this Pandemic?

Most definitely; given It is scientifically demonstrated that people who are put under chronic stress and live in adverse circumstances are more prone to get sick after exposure. Wouldn't It be better to address those collaborating factors that lead to infection Illnesses like for example granting access to fresh, nutrient food, management and support to those dealing with chronic stress, rather than causing people more of It by putting them out of work, denying them to physical activities or even breathe fresh air.

Obviously you can't get sick from the virus without catching It, but you're less likely to catch the virus if you lead a healthier lifestyle.

Yet I never hear this in the official guidelines, locking people inside and denying them fresh air is not a solution is just suicidal.
Illnesses never had a single cause, it's more of a network of triggering potential causes all working together, yet with covid we seem to have forgotten this and talking about Immune system as something we have the ability to strengthen became suddenly taboo and became all about the vaccine.

Somebody much smarter than me once said: "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result."

Well If this is the case the world in this past year has truly gone insane.

In conclusion

If you're on this platform It is because just like me you love crypto, and even if you do, only for money.

I'm convinced that this space exponential growth has been driven by other motives; a sort of peaceful rebellion, fuelled by the mistrust of those in power, centralised, crooked to the core agencies trying to control our life. The success of cryptocurrencies are the perfect example of mistrust of the establishment, and the need to have control of our money, so my question is; if just like me you don't trust them with your finances, why should you trust them with your health?

✌🏽