An easy and simple question to answer, or is it? I present my case for the question. (I am not good with title names Ha)

An easy and simple question to answer, or is it? I present my case for the question. (I am not good with title names Ha)

By Shadowghosts | Minimal philosophy | 12 Jul 2022


         "What is truth?"

 

  Yes, this is what I ask, the same one that was asked by the Roman governor Pontius Pilot. I know that most people blame him for what happened to cause the death of Christ, as most of those who read the Bible do. But I am not writing for my biblical beliefs. I ask you: If you were to be a servant of the people and ignored their cries; What is your purpose and why are you needed?
 This begs the question of perspective there was a choice of two perspectives, both sides plead that theirs should be saved and both see that theirs is the one who should live and you are a judge of what should be executed.
 Now here is where it gets interesting: once you strip all affection and stigmatism from each party. They are just three parties, one a judge, the others are those of whom the judge must choose between, and see the will of the fourth and fifth parties who support either the second or third party.
 The Scene: One supportive party is larger in people than the other and is angry at the other party who challenges the possibility of their idol to be set free. Party One: the Judge talks to the second and third party to decide, logically the judge should ask the supporting parties as those about to die are greatly likely to lie. The judge then must make a decision.
The final revelation is now upon you: take the part of the judge, choose a perspective. Or don't if you do not care about the outcome.
No matter the choice you are going to affect either the perspective or outcome of future events depending on who you save. But you don't care about this do you? You are most likely just someone reading an article that seems to have no point to it. If I lost you, please be patient: I shall tell you the entire point of this article.
The point is that no one will share the same perspective and their personal perspective is their truth, yet their can be many truths to the same question. The complication is that the question is like a mountain and we are like an irrigated stream on it, meaning the question has solid foundation whereas the perspective of another can be equated to the river changing direction due to irrigation. In an instant with a little intel we can change our perspective but that perspective is reality and we all share the same while also different realities, truths, and perspectives.
If anyone cares to read this and disagree with me, please present your argument. Those who enjoyed this or disagree please tip if you can, as I plan that I will go further in depth in the future. Thanks for reading this.
              

How do you rate this article?

2


Shadowghosts
Shadowghosts

I am here to read the writings of publishers. I do not care for publishing pictures in my posts (Except for the thumbnail).


Minimal philosophy
Minimal philosophy

A blog with posts about philosophy and other related and some unrelated fields.

Publish0x

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.

Page not displaying correctly?