To start, I'll have to define a few terms:

• Predictatory - The aspect of a thought process that was conceivable, but not conceived.  Predictatory Datricies correlate no knowledge or understanding; they're essentially moksha with respect to the process of creating thought.
• Imagined Datrix - Maybe: A fixed calculus that constantly recalculates possibility based on a series of imagined experiential data sets (or else ones that are able to be imagined, if Predictatory) based on allegorical knowledge.
• Datrix - A constantly shifting fixed calculus of any aggregation of any allegorical concept.

The production of thought has (it matters not the number; but) several aspects of which, if disengaged temporarily, allow dissimilar temporary discorrelation; and, if reëngaged into a Predictatory Imagined Datrix, may bring or else cause a reality experience to be variably engageable as to its focus in relation to time.  One measure of oracular response is the observance of a latency that does not correlate to a disengageable thought process vis-à-vis active thought.  Such temporary discorrelation can allow for pre-recorrelation (for lack of a better term) when reëngaged.  That is, one may arrive at one's thoughts prior to conceiving of them, as may happen to anyone from time to time.

In addition to this, and among other common possibilities, one may observe that the possession of one's thoughts may occur coincidentally in connection with a discorrelated Datrix.  That tends to alarm people.  It's probably not necessarily recommended actively to practice reduction of time through one's thought processes so as to induce a precognitive response.  Fortunately, however, one may variably engage any Predictatory Datrix for an Extant Datrix.  After it's reëngaged, an Extant Datrix only persists through its correlated focus, which really makes it only arbitrarily mutually exclusive from any Predictatory Datrix.  But let's not think about that.

There are many ways to reduce or enlarge time, but to cause variation of time by thought one need simply disengage a non-Predictatory Datrix and consider one that is Predictatory, whether Imagined or not, which had already been engaged within any process of thought prior to such consideration.  An Imagined Datrix is probably less correlative, and therefore less reliable, in enlarging time; however, to reduce it thereby, consideration of Imagined Datricies seem to me to be the only possibility.  The reason seems likely to me to be that a thought process that had already been subject to Predictatory consideration would necessarily be ongoing at the time of its future consideration.  An Imagined Datrix, on the other hand, is only considerable if never considered prior to such time.  Does the reduction in time come from one's focus between or away from allegory?  Or is it from the insertion of discorrelated allegory, whether or not Predictatory?  I haven't found the answer to this yet.  If anyone else has, let me know in the comments.  I'll think about it some more.

[edit:]

After experiencing a significant reduction of time during which my own metabolic processes slowed to match the soundlessness of peace while maintaining their functions, I no longer think that focus between or away from allegory concerns a reliable process of experiencing time reduction.  No Despite my own attempts, I did consider allegory in response to the experience as it had been occurring.  Further, when discorrelable allegory is inserted, it is recognizable - as seemingly bizarre as that may be.  At least that was my experience last time.