There’s either a short or a long version, but it’s time to sleep soon, so this time it’s an experiential short version.
Go for a walk somewhere, for example, with many trees, and look at them while considering any topic. Your conscious body will mire your consideration with your perspective, situation, and circumstance, as it always does. Remembrance causes admiration by reference, which causes extraction of inspirelational (why do we not have this word?) datricies (or this one?). Where any allegorically identifiable path revealed through a datrix exists, the interinspirelational components comprising its derivation also reveal. Realization is not a factor of this secondary revelation, though it can be. The tree you see from your perspective simultaneously stores and reveals to your conscious body your consideration’s reality. If you know this, then you can store and reveal any datrix so long as it’s identifiable, even if unknown or misunderstood. Knowledge and understanding are not necessarily components of realization, though they are helpful for interpretation, locally speaking.
Secondarily, and far more practically, consider donning any avatar, look at the tree; and become it. Becoming oneself requires becoming the components of oneself. In that sense, we’re only anything but ourselves when we are truly ourselves. The self is but a single, iterative datrix comprising an avatar, after all. The interposition of that datrix in its perspective continuously iterates avatar. The iterative nature of so-called ‘conscious’ thought, therefore, always introduces latency into a reality experience. Not only does this reveal that ‘conscious’ thought can only be subconscious, but also the datrix comprising and introducing the self can do virtually, realistically, actually, and even arbitrarily anything with latency. Again noting that knowledge and understanding are not necessary factors to realization, the latency delaying an expectant occurrence is the reaction that it causes to the self. In other words, the self’s reaction to any stimulus is an iterative factor of the stimulus itself. When we look at trees, we are their reaction to our perspective in viewing them, and they reveal visually the co-location of the very circumstance, situation, and admiration of our consideration extra-perspectively. (Of course, this is not limited to trees; it’s just our example.) Extracting the datrix comprising such consideration produces in time its components likewise extra-perspectively. Our reaction to such components futher extract reactive datricies, and so on.
