Imagine each of your passing thoughts as disaffected and/or unattached sets of allegorical data to which knowledge adheres not due to its content but to its allegorical, assignable, omni-objective meanings.

Observe the referential characteristics of the objects you collect around yourself.

The references to which your knowledge adheres are amplified in part by gwô: the orientation of one’s condition so as to allow observations of the relationships to and between any of these such objects and one’s uninfluenced physical response to one’s passing thoughts upon such observation.

Gwô-centric orientation tended to induce a physical fear reaction in me before I began to understand what it was. Viewing reality vis-à-vis such an orientation produces certain effects - certain as in with knowledge and understanding, not as in of a particular kind. Certainty is somewhat less reliable than its counterpart due to the effect of its observation from an observable perspective. Ignorance, on the other hand, cannot be observed. Accordingly, gwô-centric orientation requires a certain absence of ignorance achievable, at the least, through the understanding of the effects of rhetoric on one’s body.

The more specificity one can achieve in one’s thoughts, the more understanding of one’s doubts that one may extract, expose, and eliminate ones skepticism thereof.