The answer is dark. Not between Yes or No, but how long it can last if it is said yes, and whether it can survive if it is said no. Basically, crypto projects in the future are experiencing a bleak period and a really significant decline, because they are only filled with junk and fraudulent projects, there are no projects that really create the renewal needed in the real crypto currency world.

Just look at the failed projects that scattered and gave birth to the existence of the scattered shitcoin language. This is not irony but this is reality, because the typical developers born in this era have more intentions of cheating than building. Instead of building, but the end is confusing.

Coins and tokens, tokens and coins, then whether coin for token or coin for coin and token for token or token for coin. Which is which and which is which. Crypto value is now network space, so which network will be favored or which one provides the best development for the future.

Airdrops are not a way to make someone rich or successful airdrops are just a small part of marketing. And the projects that are marketed are not necessarily promising because they can only promise but never prove.