Lately, the public has been buzzing about the presence of Bitcoin ETF, but does it have the potential to provide positive value to the crypto world or is it inversely proportional to the problem of crypto formation being created?

Bitcoin ETF or Bitcoin non-ETF are both still an option for many investors. The choice between a BTC ETF and a BTC non-ETF (wallet) depends on specific factors such as one's investment objectives, risk tolerance, and technical expertise. Each has its advantages and disadvantages.

But if one looks at the purpose for which crypto was created, is its presence really in line with the purpose for which crypto was created?

Basically, it can be concluded that it is very compatible and even provides a plus for the crypto world to be recognized by the global community in the end. Where the advantage of the existence of Bitcoin ETF is that it can be used more by novice investors to avoid the risk of large losses. Because the need for non-ETF Bitcoin ownership issues (wallets) is needed for comfort with technology, and wants control and higher profit potential.

As an important note that the presence of bitcoin ETFs does imply indirect ownership conditions, management fees, and limited access. But in terms of security is better, regulated, diversified and in centralized storage.

From this point of view, it is very natural that Bitcoin ETF is highly anticipated by many people, moreover this can boost the Bitcoin price problem in the market later.

In conclusion, the presence of Bitcoin ETF has a positive impact on the crypto world and further guarantees the existence of the future of crypto. If asked which is better between Bitcoin ETF and non-ETF Bitcoin (wallet) for me personally, non-ETF Bitcoin is still the best choice according to the purpose and also the creation of Bitcoin was created. Where there is no centralized control and no physical.