From the perspective of application requirements, it is basically impossible to replace and unnecessary. IPFS will only coexist with HTTP in a small proportion.

From the perspective of pure storage demand, at present, most ordinary users really don't have much incentive to spend money to save a lot of data on the Internet, network disk and mobile hard disk.

For enterprise users, most of the needs are not just the storage itself, from the storage, CDN, application background framework, database, front-end, a full set of things, ready-made tools cloud services, he is not good? If it is changed to IPFS, the whole technology system will have to be changed, and many links do not have mature tools and standards. The cost and technical risk of investment are unbearable for small enterprises.

Large enterprises themselves are the center, and they need to be decentralized. Moreover, the cost of turning around big ships is higher. If they do not want to speculate in money, IPFS really have no attraction. The so-called low-cost IPFS is a false proposition from the perspective of the overall solution of the system, and the real demand for decentralized storage is not too big.

From my personal point of view, security, high speed, stability and accessibility can be satisfied, and I don't care whether it's on the cloud or IPFS.

If there is a subversive business model and business applications turn IPFS into a just need, it is also a new business, but it is basically impossible to replace HTTP.

Can IPFS Really Replace HTTP? Talk about your point of view, welcome to comment!

Thank you for READING, LIKING, FOLLOWING and VOTING.

You may also like reading this article：

What Is Encrypted Grid Transaction? And What Should Be Paid Attention To？