Hello all friends,

And after a turbulent process, the Terra team set a roadmap at LUNA and tried to resolve the crisis with a new cryptocurrency token. Their job was not to develop a new project, but to innovate on the old system. So it's kind of a bypass. A situation that should not have occurred to me, and I am sure that a result emerged that almost all of them were not satisfied with.

The team chose to continue as LUNA 2.0, but why was it done this way, whose problem was solved?

Be sure, the problem of those who have lost has not been fixed in any way and it does not seem possible to fix it anymore. Airdropping like a consolation prize is not a way to solve the problem, we clearly see the incompetence of the team here. In fact, it's better to think of it as a cunning team rather than as incompetent. Voting was held to determine the path they would follow to shed responsibility, and some responsibility was left to those who voted. What the team had to do was to manage a timed improvement process on the current project. Success might not come, but they would not be given the opportunity to escape this responsibility for themselves. Their pressure might have prevented them from thinking rationally, but that wasn't what it was supposed to be.

As a result of these events, people rightly think that they have been defrauded. The fact that there was no intervention in the right place, and that after the collapse no result that would cover anyone's loss, confidence was shaken.

The point I want to say after this process is that if these experiences are forgotten, tomorrow will be the destruction that will cause greater losses. Always remember to be careful...

I wish everyone a happy day and good luck...