Hi guys this article i will try to describe you a big win at chess against Swiercz Dariusz (https://ratings.fide.com/profile/1126881) with fide rating 2649 no 112 in the world with carreer peak 2669 fide rating ( no 72 in the world). He is a trainer a Saint Louis Chess Academy , the most famous chess academy  in the world.

Let's see tha game that took place yesterday, it had twitch live streaming.

It was this simul https://lichess.org/simul/jF0u0Yry where he had 30 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss (from me).

This was the game https://lichess.org/J6BdjVFZ77j5

But lets analyse a little bit the game. Until 15 move is know is the theory (by the book side - stepping main line theory) and write that black have counterplay. It does not propose 16 move for white.

But accordind to pc i have played 2 ?! moves (the first one and the 15th),

His 16th move is wrong , he might play Ng5 . So after 16...f4 i think it is an easy draw for black.

I reply with 16...Qc5 . I know f4 it is a little better but it has a trap that it is not so easy to see this. He replies 17.Ba3 and after Qf2 i am totally winning.

As you can see in the cover photo his reaction. he have not seen that.

Until 23th move everything was forced. i had calculated 23...Rb3 and believe that it is ?! and Rd3 is cleary winning. But for me Rb3 is easy winning.

I have also calculated 30.Rg7 and i told ok, i am also cleary winning despite different square bishops.

So it was an almost perfect win for me. according to pc 4 ?! (the two are in theory :) , the third is a move, that i loose a tempo but...ok i would close the game that tempo does not count so and the 4rd is at a move that i also win )

 It gives me more courage to keep up becoming better player.