Publication in Russian on the Zen blog
https://dzen.ru/a/Zu27eWUeDXs0Jm-Y
It seems that Buddhism has a lot in common with different sciences, namely the Buddhist characteristics of being: cause and effect, the absence of a constant and unchanging personality, there is nothing constant, the principle of the interdependence of everything, everything consists of particles - dharmas.
This is so scientific.
In Buddhism, you cannot step into the same river even once (the streams of water are already moving while you are stepping into the river).
It is not surprising that many philosophers: Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Husserl highly valued Buddhism and considered it the most normal religion.
I think so too, to be honest.
I'm now thoroughly hooked on books and materials on evolutionary biology and psychology, ethology, neurophysiology and I don't know how to stop.
Dawkins, Sapolsky, Lorenz, Chopra, Harari, Pinker, Peterson... I listen to lectures by Dubynin (I attended his special course at the biology department of Moscow State University) and Drobyshevsky.
I'll be honest, I haven't read fiction for about 5 years (but I don't feel like it anyway), only popular science: biology, genetics, neurology, all sorts of naturalistic topics...
This whole intellectual hodgepodge in my head is also accompanied by reading historical blogs about comparing the crisis of the Roman Republic and the transition to empire and the United States today, the Civil War in the States, as well as books about feminism.
Something like that...
Ekaterina Sveshnikova, England, London, Oxford University
https://vk.com/english.rose
Author's video content.
In collaboration with CMCproduction & SmartREC video studios
https://www.youtube.com/c/ViolettaWennman
https://ok.ru/shipshard1
https://vk.com/shipshardvk
https://www.pinterest.ca/omegagirs/
https://dzen.ru/shipshard
https://t.me/shipshard
I INVITE YOU TO THE TELEGRAM CHANNEL
UNCENSORED
https://t.me/shipshard
Publication in Russian on the Zen blog
https://dzen.ru/a/Zu27eWUeDXs0Jm-Y
