Social media is good but not optimal for democracy

By Vladan Lausevic | Vlad's politics | 15 Aug 2024


TLDR

Jillian C. York explores the dual nature of social media platforms, which have both empowered marginalized communities and enabled the spread of harmful ideologies. Initially celebrated as democratizing tools, these platforms now face criticism for inconsistent content moderation, which often disproportionately affects vulnerable groups and replicates offline repression online. York reflects on her evolving perspective, moving from opposing Big Tech's role in regulating speech to recognizing the need for pragmatic solutions to mitigate harm. She emphasizes that while social media can be a force for good, it also has the potential to facilitate oppression.

Jillian C. York examines the complex role of social media platforms in modern society, highlighting how they have both empowered marginalized communities and enabled the spread of harmful ideologies. Initially, these platforms were celebrated as tools of democratization, providing a space for voices that were previously silenced. York recounts her personal experiences during significant global events, such as the Arab Spring and the Black Lives Matter movement, where social media played a crucial role in organizing and amplifying marginalized voices.

However, York also points out the darker side of these platforms. The same tools that helped movements for justice and equality have also been used to spread hate speech, misinformation, and harmful ideologies. Content moderation on these platforms has been inconsistent and often disproportionately impacts vulnerable groups, replicating the offline repression that social media was supposed to counteract.

Over time, York's perspective on the role of Big Tech in governing speech has evolved. Initially, she believed that these companies should not play any role in regulating speech. However, the rise of right-wing extremism, disinformation, and harassment on social media has led her to a more pragmatic stance. She now sees the necessity of implementing solutions that mitigate harm while still protecting free expression.

York ultimately argues that while social media has the potential to empower, it also carries the risk of enabling oppression. As such, it is crucial to carefully consider how to craft policies that balance the need for free expression with the need to prevent harm.

 

Thanks for reading my blog. Please follow my content and write your feedback. 

How do you rate this article?

17


Vladan Lausevic
Vladan Lausevic

Based in Stockholm, Sweden as a social entrepreneur. Working with decentralization of democracy, climate transformation and economy. For more info, please get in touch with me via [email protected]


Vlad's politics
Vlad's politics

My blog about politics, society and the world in general. For more info, write to me via [email protected]

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.