If you are reading this text then it is because you must have already encountered home broker sites, or even stock financial transactions, day trader and the like.

It is curious to note that all these sites, all applications that flirt with the financial market, that are brokers, old or new, digital or physical, have as their
legal obligation to inform the loss rate that a user is exposed to.

Most of them report that financial transactions are risky, that most lose between 65% to 75% of the time and that she, the operator, has no responsibility for this.

If we take the 75%, that means, statistically, that 3 out of 4 transactions will fail.

Or, in a more extensive reading, that for every 4 users, only 1 is sufficiently able to operate conveniently without losses on that platform. Notice, I don’t say I won, just that
he was smart enough to get out of the position, or to sell the assets before taking a loss. Or made operations that, between losses and gains ended in zero.

So, in fact, what does this process do well?

Even with mechanisms for stopping losses, overgrowns, leverage, is it always lost? or do ordinary people don't know how to use these mechanisms?

On further analysis, most think the stop loss is sufficient to protect. I don't read the graph, I don't understand the mathematical predictive aspects. Worse, just like a roulette wheel,
win one and get the impression that you will win more in the next one.

The immediacy of gains overshadows the proximity of the abyss.

Bitcoin was a rock until the beginning of May, now it has become jelly. Those who bought close to 37000 will take a lot, but a long time to recover. It doesn't matter if the graphics point to a resumption,
it will take a long time.

Here comes the question: was this all due to one person? Or no one saw that China, on the one hand, and the USA, on the other were preparing the ground to weaken bitcoin to make room for their
own national cryptocurrencies?

A second question has to be asked: was not the collapse, the massive sale of bitcoins, produced by those who observed such action?

And back to the platform warnings about losses....

That is, just predicting graphically whether it will go up or down, without checking the events around it, will generate the shallow consensus that the twitter boy dropped bitcoin.

The abyss is deeper!

When I teach chess, I always tell students about a big event in the late 20th century: Kasparov versus DeepBlue. This event was preceded and comes from a long tradition of great masters playing
against several other masters at the same time: the mediocrity of many surpasses, on average, the superiority of the few. Deepblue won the second round because the machine doesn't get tired.

In the same way, when dealing with cryptocurrencies, miners are robots, machines that do not get tired (they can burn due to overheating), that they mine day and night.
However, such machines fail to overcome the mediocrity of the majority, of the 75% who lose to the system (in fact, they do not stop systems, keep in mind that the rates, the automatic position closings
transfer all the risk to the user, since entering the position already discounts the brokerage value, the goodness of entering polls for free) always ends up in some hidden loss to the users.

And that way money turns to dust, much more corroded by hidden fees and rules than in the announced debacle of bitcoin.

Cryptocurrencies use all the strategies of the traditional financial market, but in a more subtle way, always hidden behind people who seek quick answers and always click "I agree" before reading.

Money turns to dust when modern, digital people don't do like old analogue people: they don't read what they sign because they don't have time. They do not see what they do because the graph said it can be done and ignore - because they don’t have the patience to read the news anymore - the other real signs.

Not only does the money evaporate, but also the judgment, the savings of years.

Watch out for quick things, watch out for promises of gain above 5%. Everything that promises too much demands too much.

If you are emotionally able to handle these demands, you may be part of the 1 user out of 4 who does not lose money. that in the mediocrity of the majority it does not succeed.

Those who keep money, who are millionaires, notice, are people who have a foot in reality, a faith in people, money in physical and real things and a little adventure in digital things.

How much of each of these things do you have? because the proportion of each of them may not make you rich, but it can prevent you from having losses.

Getting rich, in the vast majority of times, has nothing to do with multiplying money, it has more to do with preserving what you have and betting a little bit. In the temporal faith that, over time, a long time, that little bit will be self-sufficient to run alone and add to what you preserve.

Preserving people, preserving achievements, whoever accumulates in little accumulates to spend in much.