It Wasn't Entirely Coinbase's Fault - but Greater Transparency Needed!

By rah | rah | 30 Dec 2025


You may recall my post of a few days ago when I vented my frustration at Coinbase for its sudden withdrawal of staking on USDC. Well, it turns out that it wasn’t really Coinbase’s fault – although they should have made the information more freely and readily available – a “no-reply” email for example.

However, back to the point it turns out that the halt wasn’t so sudden and that it came about as a consequence of the EU’s new MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations, which impose strict rules on stablecoins like USDC. According to Coinbase’s own help page, the USDC Rewards programme has been ended for all EEA customers because MiCA introduces new requirements for e‑money tokens. The programme officially ended on 1 December 2025, with final rewards paid shortly after, in my case 18 December – so again back to my point about clarity that gave them almost three weeks to inform me about the end of staking. They could even use a ticker tape type of thing as they often do for any generalised notification.

With USDC being classified as an e‑money token under MiCA they are treated differently to other Coinbase staked assets such as ETH, SOL and ADA etc). What distinguished USDC rewards was that they were essentially a loyalty yield, not staking — and MiCA treats that as a regulated financial product and when we get into the specifics that caused the end of USDC staking the fact is that there were a whole new raft of strict obligations for StableCoin issuers and platforms introduced These included new reserve and issuance requirements for such e‑money tokens as well as restrictions on incentives that could be seen as yield, interest, or a financial return on e‑money tokens. Furthermore, a strict compliance deadline was presented that has to be met by the end of 2025. In the end Coinbase chose to remove the rewards programme rather than risk non‑compliance. I would be interested to find out what other platforms have done concerning staked USDC within the EEA.

Nevertheless, it's a shame that such a team of experts couldn’t find a workaround!

So, while I have calmed down somewhat and recognise that it wasn’t down to Coinbase in the end I still believe there is some validity to my argument for clarity and transparency. Hiding it away on a help page is not great and you never know I might just have made different decisions early in December had I known what I know now.

I must also freely admit that I had never hear of MiCA before and it might be worth some further exploration in a future post, but I am guessing it operates in a similiar way to SEC.

As always stay safe and well my friends.

How do you rate this article?

18


rah
rah

I love reading and technology as well as history. I teach English and Business to professional clients as well as soft skills with a focus on communications. I am a big fan of both Sheffield Wednesday and Lincoln City Football clubs


rah
rah

Experienced Business Owner and Coach and Tutor who now trades in Crypto. It is proving to be an interesting journey with so much technical language involved. Follow me as I learn the trade (and how to trade). Made some howling mistakes to begin with, but still learning and will share what I learn as I learn it for the benefit of the community. - RAH

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.