Oil and gold uprise because of hormuz whipsaw

Oil Whipsaws Back Above $88 — While Gold Waits for Jackson Hole

By News Trader | NewsTrader | 27 Aug 2026


Oil Whipsaws Back Above $88 — While Gold Waits for Jackson Hole

Well, that escalated quickly.

Just 36 hours ago, energy markets were getting hammered. Headlines were everywhere about oil tumbling on the latest Iran-Oman talks over the Strait of Hormuz. I wrote about that selloff myself.

Now Brent is back around $88.

In the space of a single day, the market managed to panic, reverse course, and then make everyone question what the hell just happened.

If you're feeling a little dizzy, you're not alone. Even seasoned traders are dealing with the same whiplash.

So let's slow things down and look at what actually changed — and what it could mean for oil and gold heading into the weekend.

Oil just had a seriously strange 24 hours

The sequence is worth looking at because it tells you a lot about the market we're dealing with right now.

Wednesday morning: Brent dropped to roughly $85–86, its lowest level in about two weeks. WTI slipped toward $80.

The trigger was optimism around Iran and Oman announcing work on a "phased framework" for a temporary shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, including a joint effort to clear mines.

Traders immediately started stripping geopolitical risk out of crude prices.

Energy stocks followed. SK Innovation fell about 11% in Seoul. Woodside dropped roughly 4% in Sydney, while BP was down close to 3% in London.

Then came the afternoon.

Brent ripped more than 4% higher from the day's lows, moved back above $89, and eventually settled around $88.40.

Same day. Same Strait of Hormuz.

So what changed?

Quite a lot, actually.

The "peace is coming" narrative started falling apart

The initial optimism ran into some uncomfortable realities.

First, Washington is still applying serious economic pressure on Tehran.

The US Treasury is targeting Iran's oil-smuggling revenues through what it calls Operation Economic Outcast, while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned of "economic D-Day" for companies and countries that continue doing business with Iran.

That isn't exactly the backdrop you would expect for a smooth return to normal oil flows.

Then there's China.

Beijing has pushed back against Washington, accusing the US of disrupting the global financial system. And this matters because China reportedly buys more than 80% of Iran's oil exports.

In other words, there's another geopolitical confrontation sitting underneath the Hormuz story.

And Tehran isn't exactly behaving like a government preparing for peace.

Iran has stressed that the proposed Oman arrangement would be a temporary corridor, not a full reopening of the Strait.

Its position remains that a broader reopening depends on the war ending and the blockade being lifted.

Iran has also told the IAEA that nuclear-site inspections cannot currently be requested during wartime. Meanwhile, a senior Iranian official has acknowledged that the country's fuel situation is becoming "unsustainable," with the blockade restricting imports.

Put all of that together and it's not difficult to understand why traders who aggressively sold crude around $85 suddenly started reconsidering the supply risk.

Here's the reality check

This is the part I'd keep in mind before getting too excited about either direction.

Only five commodity vessels reportedly passed through the Strait of Hormuz on August 25.

The ten-day average was around 15.

Before the conflict, roughly 20 million barrels of oil per day moved through this chokepoint.

Then there's the question of how much oil is actually getting through now.

The US says flows are around 8–9 million barrels per day.

Independent ship-tracking estimates put the number closer to 2–6 million barrels per day.

That's a pretty enormous gap.

And the mines?

They're still there.

Calling it a "joint mine-clearing initiative" sounds reassuring, but clearing a strategic waterway of mines is slow, dangerous and technically complicated. There isn't a magic switch that gets turned on overnight.

As one PVM analyst put it earlier this week, a permanent return of normal Hormuz flows is "anything but a foregone conclusion."

ING has made a similar argument: genuine normalization would require the US blockade to be lifted and sanctions eased.

Neither of those things appears imminent.

So where does oil go from here?

I see two broad paths.

Scenario one: Hormuz gradually reopens

If the Iran-Oman arrangement becomes formal and tankers begin moving through the corridor in meaningful numbers, the geopolitical premium embedded in crude should continue to unwind.

Goldman Sachs has suggested Brent could move toward $80 by year-end if Hormuz fully reopens during the fourth quarter.

That's the bearish oil scenario.

And it's not difficult to imagine.

Scenario two: talks break down

If negotiations stall again — something we've already seen happen several times since June — the market could add the risk premium back just as quickly as it removed it.

Inventories are falling. The global diesel market is already tight following attacks on Russian refining capacity. And in a market this nervous, it doesn't take much to spark another repricing.

Wednesday's afternoon rally was a pretty good demonstration.

Oil doesn't need a new war to jump.

Sometimes it just needs one bad headline.

My base case?

More chop.

Probably messy, headline-driven, stop-hunting price action until we see something more convincing than diplomatic statements — namely, actual tankers moving through an actual corridor.

Personally, I wouldn't want to get married to either side of this trade right now.

Meanwhile, gold has been quietly doing its thing

This is the part I think deserves more attention.

While crude has been throwing itself around the room, gold has been much calmer.

Gold has been consolidating around $4,600–4,650, remaining close to three-month highs after briefly touching $4,696 earlier this week.

And here's the crazy part:

Gold is up roughly 13% this month.

That's a huge move, especially considering that some of the biggest headlines recently have been about potential de-escalation.

So why isn't gold selling off?

Because this particular version of "good news" can actually be bullish for gold.

Think about the chain reaction:

Lower oil → lower inflation pressure → less pressure on the Fed to keep rates high → potentially weaker dollar → stronger gold.

That's essentially the macro story behind gold's move from roughly $4,000 in July toward $4,650 now.

And it's one reason traders continue buying dips even when the headlines around Hormuz look more constructive.

But gold is approaching a much more interesting moment.

Now the market is waiting for Jackson Hole

There are two events that could decide whether gold's rally extends or finally takes a breather.

First: the US PCE inflation report.

This is the inflation gauge the Federal Reserve watches particularly closely.

A hotter-than-expected reading could push rate expectations higher and put pressure on gold.

A softer number would do the opposite — potentially giving the rally another shot of fuel.

Second: Fed Chair Kevin Warsh speaks at Jackson Hole on Friday.

Markets are currently treating the September rate decision as something close to a coin flip.

That's why his comments matter.

A hawkish signal could knock gold lower.

A dovish message could send traders chasing the metal higher, potentially opening the door toward the $4,730–$5,000 zone that some analysts have been discussing.

The levels I'm watching

For the chart crowd, $4,620 is an interesting battleground right now.

If gold can produce a convincing daily close above the $4,696 high, the next leg higher could begin.

On the downside, I'd keep an eye on $4,576 first.

Below that, $4,300 becomes the much more important support area.

Looking further out, UBS has reportedly put a $5,400 12-month target on gold, while a number of major banks are sitting somewhere around the $4,500–$4,900 range for year-end.

Those targets aren't guarantees, obviously. They're just estimates in a market that's been making a habit of surprising people.

The bigger picture

The simplest way I can describe the last 24 hours is this:

Oil sold the hope. Then it bought back the reality.

The initial Hormuz optimism was enough to knock crude sharply lower, but the underlying supply problems haven't magically disappeared. Until vessels are consistently moving through the Strait again, the market is going to remain extremely sensitive to every headline.

Gold, meanwhile, has been much more composed.

It's sitting on a roughly 13% monthly gain, and now the next catalyst isn't necessarily another geopolitical headline.

It's inflation.

It's the Fed.

And it's Jackson Hole.

So if you're watching the market this weekend, I'd focus on three things:

Does the Iran-Oman corridor actually get formalized?

How many tankers are physically making it through Hormuz each day?

What message does Kevin Warsh deliver from Jackson Hole?

Everything else is probably background noise.

Not financial advice. I'm just a retail market watcher trying to make sense of a market that somehow managed to change its mind three times before lunch. Do your own research and manage your risk.

 

Sources: Fox News, Reuters, CNBC, CNN, The National, OilPrice.com, Trading Economics, ING, Saxo Bank, PVM, UBS

How do you rate this article?

2


News Trader
News Trader

News Trader 📈 | Gold • Oil • Platinum • Commodities I trade news & economic events. Sharing my own analysis for XAUUSD, Crude Oil & precious metals. Real market insights from my personal experience. Not financial advice.


NewsTrader
NewsTrader

News Trader 📊 | XAUUSD • Oil • Platinum • Commodities. Trading the news & economic calendar. Sharing my personal experience & honest analysis on Gold, Crude Oil, Platinum & commodity markets. My own perspective — never financial advice. Always DYOR.

Publish0x

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.

Page not displaying correctly?