Grab is now at the very heart of the digital economy in Southeast Asia. It has become a massive super app combining taxi hailing, food delivery, and financial services into a single platform. Even Uber couldn't gain a foothold in this market, but Grab has integrated so well into the local culture that it has become the region's digital infrastructure. Moreover, it's a profitable and self-financing company, having been a loss-making growth machine for years. But the real question is: Is Grab truly ambitious enough to "transform the future," or is it just playing to stay strong in its current market?
The numbers are impressive at first glance. Revenues increased by 17% year-on-year (20% at constant exchange rates), it has posted positive EBITDA for the last five quarters, and if I'm not mistaken, it has reported a profit on a GAAP basis for the first time. Monthly active users reached 42 million, while loan volume on the fintech side increased by 81%, and deposits rose by 50% quarter-on-quarter. So, the business model works, the user ecosystem is growing, and the network effect is strengthening. But looking a little deeper into this picture, you see that Grab isn't a "structural revolution," but rather a player growing within the existing system.
Take the financial services side, for example. Yes, Southeast Asia is still a huge opportunity for the "unbanked" population. Grab is doing good work in this area. But what it's doing isn't redefining banking, it's simply moving it to the digital realm. So it's not creating a new model; it's adapting classic finance to the mobile age. This leads to growth limited by regulatory walls. It's good, but it's not the kind of business that generates "high-multiplier technology revenue."
Its core business lines, transportation and food delivery, are stuck at a similar point. These businesses are inherently costly, labor-intensive, and have limited scalability. Population, city density, income levels are fixed; there's a limit to growth. No matter how well you manage, in the physical world, you reach a peak at a certain point. Even Uber is still struggling with the same problem, and the situation is no different for Grab.
The real long-term risk, however, is automation. When driverless vehicles become widespread, this sector will fundamentally change. Uber is preparing for this future, partnering with giants like Waymo and already starting robotaxi testing. Grab is lacking in this area. If that technology becomes widespread in 5-10 years, Grab's model could be overturned. In other words, today's advantage could become tomorrow's risk.
Yes, I agree Grab is a very good company, but it's not "the next big thing." Its foundation is solid thanks to regional leadership, positive cash flow, and a loyal user base; but its ceiling is limited. The winners in the next decade will be companies that redefine their industries in areas like AI, automation, and data infrastructure. Grab isn't a pioneer in any of these. It's a nice, mature, stable business; but I don't see a story that will "explode multipliers." However, the market is currently unfair; it deserves a minimum of $5-6.
The information, comments and recommendations contained herein are not within the scope of investment consultancy. Investment consultancy services are provided within the framework of the investment consultancy agreement to be signed between brokerage firms, portfolio management companies, banks that do not accept deposits and customers. The comments in this article are only my personal comments and these comments may not be appropriate for your financial situation and risk return. For this reason, investments should not be made based on the information and comments in my articles.
