MakeItReal

Crypto’s $60 Million Gamble Backfired. Is the CLARITY Act Now in Danger?

Crypto’s $60 Million Gamble Backfired. Is the CLARITY Act Now in Danger?

The crypto industry spent millions trying to shape the future of American politics. It had a crypto-friendly president in the White House, strong financial backing behind its candidates, and hopes of finally securing clear regulatory rules.

Then came the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats have taken control of both the House and the Senate, and one result perfectly captures the political shock facing the industry: Sherrod Brown is going back to the Senate despite more than $60 million spent by crypto-backed political groups trying to defeat him.

This is more than just an expensive election failure. It could force the entire crypto industry to rethink its strategy in Washington.

The CLARITY Act Faces an Even Bigger Mountain

For years, the crypto sector has argued that the United States needs clear rules defining how digital assets, exchanges and blockchain businesses should be regulated.

The CLARITY Act was supposed to deliver that framework. It passed the House with bipartisan support, including dozens of Democratic votes, but failed to advance in the Senate in September.

Now, with Democrats preparing to control both chambers, its chances of passing in its current form look significantly weaker.

The problem goes beyond party politics. Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns about consumer protection, market oversight and potential conflicts of interest involving the Trump family's crypto activities.

World Liberty Financial, the crypto venture associated with the Trump family, could also face increased congressional scrutiny. That creates an uncomfortable situation for an industry that has become closely associated with the president's political agenda.

The message from the election is becoming difficult to ignore: political access does not automatically translate into lasting legislation.

Crypto Needs Democrats, Too

There is an important detail that should not be overlooked: the crypto industry did not lose every race.

Fairshake and other industry-backed groups secured victories in several contests, demonstrating that their financial influence remains significant. But the Ohio result exposed the limits of relying too heavily on campaign spending and political alliances.

And perhaps the biggest mistake would be to interpret this election as a reason to abandon bipartisan cooperation.

More than 70 House Democrats had previously supported the CLARITY Act. That means there is still a foundation for negotiation, even if the political environment has changed dramatically.

The next strategy should focus on issues that can attract support from both parties: stronger consumer protections, clearer rules for crypto companies, safeguards against conflicts of interest, protection for blockchain developers and more practical tax policies.

In other words, the industry needs to convince lawmakers that sensible crypto regulation benefits American consumers and businesses, not just the companies financing political campaigns.

Bitcoin Doesn't Have to Wait for Washington

Interestingly, Bitcoin's market reaction has been quite different from the political outlook.

After initially falling following the election results, BTC recovered on Wednesday and climbed back above $80,000, according to Reuters.

This highlights an important distinction: the political environment can become more complicated for crypto businesses without necessarily changing Bitcoin's long-term investment case.

Exchanges, stablecoin issuers and blockchain companies depend heavily on regulatory clarity, licenses and institutional access. Bitcoin, meanwhile, is also influenced by global liquidity, real interest rates, institutional demand and investment flows.

Of course, regulation still matters for Bitcoin's adoption. But a congressional election does not change its supply limit, its protocol or the fundamental properties that make it different from traditional financial assets.

I would not interpret a market rebound as proof that the industry has overcome its political problems. Nor would I automatically consider a Democratic victory bearish for Bitcoin.

The real test will come over the next two years.

The crypto industry has already demonstrated that it can spend enormous amounts of money to influence elections. Now it must demonstrate something much harder: that it can build political support across party lines and turn its demands into legislation.

Washington's political landscape has changed. Crypto's next big battle won't be about winning elections. It will be about winning trust.

💎 Free Crypto Opportunities I Personally Follow🔥


1. GRASS — (DePIN/AI)

What if your unused internet bandwidth could help you earn crypto rewards?

Grass is a decentralized network that allows users to share their unused internet bandwidth and earn Grass Points in return.

Getting started is simple:

  • 🌐 Browser extension: automatically earn points while browsing.

  • 💻 Desktop app: up to 2× rewards.

  • 📱 Mobile app: up to 3× rewards.

🔥 Season 1 and Season 2 rewards have already been distributed! I've personally participated in Grass and received my Season 1 and Season 2 allocations. Now, Season 3 is underway, offering another opportunity to accumulate Grass Points and potentially benefit from future rewards.

The earlier you start, the more time you have to participate. Why not put your unused bandwidth to work?

👉 Farm Grass airdrop now: https://app.grass.io/register?referralCode=lNAoYuHQUPN22mF

6ca5779762bbc58839bcf12e57978c326dbe25dda8abdc3e65673ac48cffafbf.png

Did you enjoy this article?



MakeItReal
MakeItReal

💸 Whether you're new to crypto or a seasoned airdrop hunter, this blog helps you farm, earn, and grow — one click at a time. 👉 Follow and join the journey. Let's Make It Real — together, to the moon 🌕

Publish0x Publish0x

Reward the author with $0.01 in crypto, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
Rewards are FREE. Publish0x pays them, not you.

Page not displaying correctly?