In this analysis post we're going to be taking a look at Solana's voting statistics and trying to determine whether or not it's worth a shot at actually investing into the currency based off of their community's voting sentiment and distribution of voting power dependent on how many rich people want to ruin or bring down the price based off of negative, positive, and neutral behavior based off of the following graphs:

Overall, future behavior for most of these mass voters are clearly competitive with other blockchains, we can tell this due to the fact that developers are rallying behind a list of initiatives listed directly above. These initiatives clearly display future growth, and I'm not talking about a simple 10% growth, I'm talking about growth well into the 80%+ due to the fact that light clients and formal verification would simply revolutionize the chain and really put it up on a pedastol when developers try and pick what blockchain to move onto. 

To be fair, developers care more about community sentiment and TVL than they do about how easy it is to create a program for a community. The higher the tvl that are distributed into projects, the more likely developers are to want to get into the game and revolutionize the chain because of what the growth possibilities are like. 

I know that this analysis was extremely straight forward, but that's just how it's supposed to be. 

That's all for today. 

Cheers!