Why Didn't Circle Freeze USDC Following the Drift Exploit? (DeFi)


As you may know, centralized stablecoin issuers, Circle (USDC) and Tether (USDT), are able to remotely freeze funds in your wallet. These two stablecoins have a feature in the token contract that allows them to be blacklisted, preventing their spending, sale, and transfer. These freezings are theoretically triggered by serious violations and illegal acts. However, despite a massive theft from a DeFi protocol a few weeks ago, Circle, which manages USDC, has decided not to intervene.

dbaa3b84657aa9457a47cf271a655be8be45f955b48ce3bfc6a7c68c1cf10658.jpg
Circle's controversial decision not to freeze USDC, following the attack on Drift protocol that stole $270 million, appears to be leading to a lawsuit filed by users themselves. This decentralized exchange (Drift) was drained on Solana by a group of hackers (who infiltrated the company) who posed as quantitative traders and studied the protocol for several months. Attackers used Circle's bridge (Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol) to transfer funds from Solana to Ethereum, and despite an eight-hour window to act, Circle decided not to freeze the funds. Other funds were transferred using a Wormhole bridge and then through mixers with Tornado Cash.

Renowned investigator ZachXBT asks: "Why would cryptocurrency companies (and others) continue to use USDC if Circle doesn't guarantee the protection of these funds?".

dec4ec8098367294538e197adc4d31c2d52790c2c5716dffb068b48010da92ce.jpg

It's called decentralization, bro. Decentralization. I know many people would like DeFi to become similar to traditional finance and chains similar to banks, but personally, I hope a modicum of decentralization remains. The difference between those who are "old school" in the blockchain sector and those who started a few years ago is precisely this: not giving "decentralization" the importance it deserves.

Circle's response, however, was ambiguous and controversial, stating that they freeze funds in the event of:
1) Sanctions.
2) Police orders.
3) Lawsuits and court cases.

It's a controversial view, in my opinion, almost as if there are some (courts and law enforcement) who have the right to demand freezing. According to data from TRM Labs, approximately $141 billion in stablecoins were used for illicit activities last year. According to ZachXBT, $420 million in USDC was not frozen despite being linked to illicit activities. Meanwhile, Tether helped Drift by repaying part of the lost funds ($148 million) on the condition that USDC be replaced with USDT.

 

Are you interested in ways to earn crypto bonus? Check it out here: Some Sites To Earn Crypto Bonus (Old & New)

How do you rate this article?

76


☑️0🆇D̺͈͙͕̿ͧ̑ͣ🅰🆅🅸🅳eͤ
☑️0🆇D̺͈͙͕̿ͧ̑ͣ🅰🆅🅸🅳eͤ Verified Member

I love Bitcoin since 2012. I also love NFT. #BTC #ETH #MLBSorare


Darknet
Darknet

The topics will be 🅒🅡🅨🅟🅣🅞, of course. BTC and Degen crypto since 2012.⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.