Are They Vulnerabilities or Undocumented Debug Features


0487f5228e3e9dcee3431dfff68fa93533af533691958581488e847a6013a5f6.jpg

The recent undocumented code in the ESP32 microchip, made by Chinese manufacturer Espressif Systems, is used in over 1 billion devices and could represent a cybersecurity risk. Its reveal by security researchers has kicked off an interesting discussion regarding undocumented features in firmware devices - are they security vulnerabilities or just debug tools?

At the end of the day, any debug, test, or validation features should be removed (or fused off in the case of hardware) before they become available to customers. At the very least, features should be documented, so everyone knows the potential risk.

Otherwise, features become tools for threat actors who may use them separately or in combination with other tools to undermine the system, expose data, make lateral movements to other systems, or exfiltrate sensitive information.

This issue is widespread in the software, OS, firmware, and hardware industries, but that is no excuse, as these represent an aggregate risk. Every vendor should be responsible in removing debug, test, and validation features and at the very least documenting those which need to remain. Transparency is important for trust and security.

How do you rate this article?

13


Matthew Rosenquist
Matthew Rosenquist

Cybersecurity Strategist specializing in the evolution of threats, opportunities, and risks in pursuit of optimal security for our digital world.


Cybersecurity Tomorrow
Cybersecurity Tomorrow

Cybersecurity strategy perspectives for the emerging risks and opportunities of securing our digital world. The insights of today will lead to tomorrow's security, privacy, and safety foundations.

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.