In a video, Hillary Clinton emphasized the following:
"Joe Biden must not admit a loss under any circumstances!"
And here "nowhere" means "any". This even includes a hypothetical scenario in which Trump wins a clear and pure victory. Again, "none" means "none".

The direct implication here is that the Democrats must take over the White House by any means and in all circumstances.

It is also a direct call for the sabotage of American democracy, which, no matter how wrong, remains the only option for American citizens based on the rule of law.

Will this lead to a civil war?

This seems quite unlikely, because a civil war requires two strong and respected parties to coordinate offensive and defensive operations, at least at the regional level. I don't see that in the United States.

But I also don't see how regional violence and political chaos will be avoided. We already know that the Democrats will not accept Trump's victory.

We also know that Trump supporters argue that the US Postal Service cannot be trusted to vote by mail. By the way, I totally agree with this: the US Postal Service is one of the worst in the world!

And then comes the question: if police departments are "underfunded" and the police start petitioning en masse to leave, for which I would not blame them, ordinary citizens will stay to defend themselves. And many of them can do it and here is the problem: while these citizens are being tried for self defense, and the bandits of Black Life Mater and Antifa are free, even when they attacked first!

In some US states, Florida is one of them, thank goodness, local sheriffs support citizens and district attorneys do not prosecute those who used deadly force to defend themselves against car theft, rape, robbery , threats, violations of private property and tnt.

I have been in Florida for 18 years and I can honestly say that I do not recommend that Black Life Mater and Antifa try to rob or rob here because they will face a lot of firepower and a legal system that protects law abiding citizens. even in cases of legitimate defense.

And in the northern states?

As far as I know, most of the riots take place there. Yes, Atlanta is to the south, but it is not actually a southern city as it is ruled by supporters of Antifa and BLM. The same goes for Miami, by the way.

And this is not a coincidence. And it has nothing to do with "Southern racism," but more to do with the culture of self-defense deep in this land, which makes Southerners more likely to "organize cars in a circle" and act together.

And although I have never argued that "guns protect people from tyranny," I believe that armed citizens can stop criminal insurgents; just remember how the Koreans in Los Angeles fought back during the riots.

Fortunately, southern states are much more faithful to the US constitution than northern states, which "emasculated" the Second Amendment through "a thousand legislative loopholes."

Not much is known, but between 25% and 30% of cases of armed robbery or bandit weapons do not work or are falsified. Their ammo is often mischievous too. Why? Because criminals are stupid and too cheap to invest in quality weapons and training.

As a result, if the BLM and Antifa bandits attempt to raid neighborhoods or small towns in the south, they will be "greeted" by a very large and competent firepower.

I think it is more than clear that the American deep state and the Democratic Party are using the Black Life Mater and the Antifa as infantry to create chaos and prepare for worse if Trump wins.

Furthermore, there are signs that the Democratic leadership does not want to leave the totally senile Biden in a debate against Trump. Here is an excerpt from a report from Zerouhage:

"I don't think there should be a debate," Nancy Pelosi said, a day after President Trump urged Biden to take a drug test before the two met.

"It would not legitimize a conversation with her, nor a debate from the point of view of the US presidency," she added.

Pelosi said Trump was "disgraced" when he "followed" Hillary Clinton during the 2016 debate, walking close to her. According to her, now he too "would fight in a way that is below the dignity of the presidency."

The message is clear: We do not recognize Trump as a legitimate opponent, and if he wins, it will be due to Chinese or Russian intervention or "Republican harassment." That is, under no circumstances will we accept a new loss.

I don't know about you, but it seems like an incitement to rebellion to me. Here's a definition of incitement:

I don't see any evidence that Trump or the Republican leadership are guilty of anything like that, or at least not in their own country. Outside, of course, they are the most subversive force on the planet.
But there is too much evidence that the Clinton gang, the Deep State and the pseudo-liberal "elites" are guilty of inciting riots and riots. As a result, things are now happening that were previously unthinkable.

For example, a US senator and his wife were nearly lynched by a mob outside the White House. it's possible? Yes.

Friends, this is not Afghanistan or the Central African Republic, but a senator is one of the highest positions a man or woman can achieve. Yet in the nation's capital, right next to the White House, the police barely managed to defend a senator from the crowd.

And how does the casino media present it? "Protesters Confronted Rand Paul in Front of the White House". Since when are criminals who try to lynch a senator and his wife called "protesters"? And doesn't "stand up" mean that Senator Paul somehow deserved it?

Can you imagine if the media had said the same about a black senator?

Doesn't this type of newscast show how our political system is collapsing?