It's been only a few weeks since the Minereum shitdrop was concluded, and all of the sudden just a few days ago another shitcoin under the same name started dropping in your wallets (if you haven't received the first shitdrop, consider yourself lucky).

This new shitdrop is not related to the original one - the contract address is not mentioned in the Minereum website - and it doesn't look to have any other function than polluting wallets with useless crap.

As with the original Minereum, you cannot transfer it out, and you cannot burn it, or use it in any way. You can only have it there sitting in your wallet, unless you have a wallet app that can filter-out shitcoins like Minereum.

Which brings the question that should have been asked years ago: why a wallet address holder has no way to express consent on any given transaction? Any contract in this world needs to be signed by both parties to be valid. If it's signed only by one party, the contract is invalid, until the other party provides consent to the contract terms by signing it.

This weakness is native to the Ethereum protocol, and has to be fixed.