Do you know that we Can build apps by simply chatting with AI ?

 According to an experienced AI user here is a simple but revealing experiment which gives the exact same prompt to three leading AI models—Gemini 3, Claude Opus 4.5, and GPT-5.1 Codex— and see which is actually good at design. One model produces a polished, thoughtful, near-production-ready redesign. One delivers something usable but uninspired. And one. . . reminds us that strong coding ability doesn’t always translate to front-end taste. If you’ve ever wondered which AI you should trust with real design work, this publication gives you the clearest answer yet.

Let us go !!

1) Anthropic’s Opus 4.5 is the clear design winner. It delivered the most visually appealing and functionally complete redesign, with thoughtful details like hover effects with call-to-action arrows, placeholder images for missing content, and elegant background imagery instead of generic gradients.

2) Codex 5.1 struggles with front-end design. Despite its strong coding capabilities, OpenAI’s model delivered the weakest design, falling back on “AI slop purple gradients” and creating non-functional elements. The lesson : don’t use it as your design resource.

3) Gemini 3 is serviceable but lacks refinement. While it created a functional redesign with hero sections and card layouts, it missed opportunities for visual polish and didn’t handle edge cases (like missing images) as elegantly as Opus 4.5.

In conclusion, all the three AI model ( Gemini 3, Claude Opus 4.5, and GPT-5.1 Codex) are usefull and helpful to the work of human being. Their main objective is to boost the performance and increase the efficiency of workers.

AI is used by a worker to increase his productivity. AI does not work at the place of a worker.