Orange head and text: Self Invest – Reflect. Habits. Freedom. Light background, clean style, financial theme.

#289 🔸 Why some people cannot be trusted no matter how much you love them

By luciman | SelfInvest | 29 May 2026


Respect, which I wrote about last time, creates the conditions in which the other person can open up. But genuine opening, the kind that allows real intimacy and deep connection, needs more than respect. It needs trust. And trust, unlike love, is not felt. It is built. From small, repeated, consistent actions over time.

It is a distinction I consider essential and that many people overlook: you can love someone deeply and not trust them. Love is an emotion. Trust is an assessment based on evidence. And when the two do not align, the relationship lives in a permanent tension that neither can resolve alone.


What builds trust in a relationship? Not declarations, not grand promises, not vows. But consistency in small things. The fact that you do what you say you will do, not in the important and visible moments, but in the mundane ones, when nobody is watching and there is no external stake. That you are there when you said you would be. That you send the message you promised to send. That you remember what you were told and take it seriously next time.

Brené Brown describes trust through an acronym I find useful: BRAVING. Boundaries, Reliability, Accountability, Vault, Integrity, Non-judgment, Generosity. That is, clear limits, reliability, taking responsibility for mistakes, confidentiality, integrity between what you say and what you do, absence of judgement, and generous interpretation of the other's actions. Each of these is a piece. The absence of any one creates a crack.


Transparency is one of the components most frequently misunderstood. It does not mean saying everything, at any moment, without filter. That is not transparency, it is sometimes aggression disguised as honesty. Genuine transparency means not constructing a version of yourself that differs from who you are, not hiding important things that would affect the other person's decisions, not creating a parallel reality in which your partner operates with incomplete information about something essential.

There is a form of lack of transparency that is perhaps more damaging than direct lying: deliberate omission. Letting the other person believe something false through what you do not say. Managing perception instead of managing reality. Many people consider themselves honest because they do not lie, but practise omission with a consistency that produces the same effect: a partner who, at some point, realises they never truly knew who they were living with.


Consistency is perhaps the most underestimated ingredient in building trust. The human brain, and especially the autonomic nervous system, detects inconsistency before the conscious mind processes it. When someone's behaviour varies significantly depending on their mood, the context, or what they want to obtain, the other person's body registers the insecurity, even if the mind tries to rationalise it. Inconsistent people are not necessarily unkind or manipulative. Sometimes they are simply people who have not done the work on themselves. But the effect on trust is the same.


Rebuilding trust after it has been broken is a subject worth addressing directly. Many people believe a sincere apology or a good explanation is sufficient. It is not. Broken trust is rebuilt through behaviour, not through words, and through consistent behaviour over time, not through an isolated gesture of repair. Gottman's research shows that rebuilding trust requires far more time and far more positive evidence than building it initially. That does not mean it is not possible. It means it requires genuine patience from both sides.


Sexual life is a domain where trust has a direct and often unacknowledged effect. Authentic erotic openness, the willingness to be physically and emotionally vulnerable in intimacy, is not possible in the absence of a solid foundation of trust. People who do not trust their partner can have sex, but they cannot be truly present in it. There is a difference between a body that performs and one that surrenders. Surrender, in the good sense of the word, the kind that produces profound erotic experiences, requires the safety of knowing the other person will be there, that they will not judge you, that they will not use your vulnerability against you.

Couples with a satisfying sexual life over the long term do not have magic chemistry. They have trust built over time through hundreds of small moments in which each chose to be consistent, transparent, and present.

Think about the level of trust in your relationship right now. Is it built from actions or more from the desire to believe? And if there is a crack, however small, what would need to change concretely to repair it?

How do you rate this article?

5


luciman
luciman

I believe in personal growth as a continuous journey — especially on a psychological, financial, and broader human level. What I share here comes from direct observations and real-life experiences — both my own and those of people around me.


SelfInvest
SelfInvest

SelfInvest – A blog about you, written by someone like you. Tired of fluffy motivational advice? Here you’ll find no magic formulas – just honest reflections, clear ideas, and simple tools for real, lasting growth. I write from experience: the mistakes, the breakthroughs, and the shifts that truly changed me. If you're looking for more focus, sustainable habits, and inner freedom, you're in the right place. 📩 Subscribe and let’s build your best self – together.

Publish0x

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.