In the Platonist image of meaning, a convention is needed to connect the arbitrary symbol "blue" with its meaning, significance or form,

Once this connection is made, the meaning autonomously determines the extent of “blue”.

Constructivism, as a science initiated by Durkheim, denies that such autonomous linguistic action at a distance is in fact possible.

Rather, it holds that the extent of “blue” is slowly fixed through the unfolding of human acceptance.

On the same line. there are good reasons to think that acceptance, like the notion of truth, can be regarded as an entirely non-semantic notion.

So if one concedes that "accepting a sentence" is an attitude closely related to "accepting its truth", then it would be lawful to concede also that "assuming something" is an attitude closely related to "assuming its truth".

Sun Tzu puts the acceptance of reality, which in other words is to relativize the inner truths in line with society's, leads to defeat!

He explains, in this sense, the issue of death in battle, and gives two pieces of advice, one for those who are in the imminent situation and the other for those who are about to cause it.

When in a battle, where the enemy is trapped, there are two perspectives:

the internal one, of those who have no way out and, in this case, the commander has two options to be evaluated:

- if you have any escape route, due to enemy superiority;

- If, in the face of martial annihilation, how much damage can be inflicted on the enemy before falling.

For both analyses, Sun Tzu advises the commander, in case there is an escape route, to block, in such a way that none of his soldiers can flee, lowering morale and, once the escape route is closed, keep the swords, not the shields, in a sharp way: cornered people with no way out fought to the death like lions, for certain death is!

the external, of those who are about to coerce the trapped troops, the commander has two options:

- open an escape route, to disperse high morale in the face of death.

- Do not attack, allowing time for morale to drop and individual dispersal and hunting, depending on the size of the force itself.

For both analyses, the advice is not to lose a large number of soldiers in a useless way, since the defeated troop is trapped!

In this demonstration, it is evident that inner truth interacts with the fabric of larger reality.

The convergence of these truths, these states of mind, as you like, determines behavioral attitudes in the face of the most critical situations.

In the field of cryptocurrencies, the lesson generally teaches much the same thing: if you're cornered, with assets down, keep the asset, as it will rise and your morale will rise. Sending attack will make you lose troops and values ​​and more, defeat is already guaranteed, for that moment!

If you are about to attack a falling asset, remember: scattering, in this case the asset's graphical congestion, down but with rising impetus, must be curbed, as in case of scattering, soldiers and values ​​will be lost. in a won position, just by being in a hurry. Just for lack of patience.

Whether on the physical or cryptocurrency battlefield, the moment to enter a position or exit it is what guarantees gain in losses or losses in gain.

If blue can be yellow, depending on the understanding of the collectivity and personal experience, or that the assumption of truth depends on the set of information you have, and almost always you don't have all the angles of knowledge, then the only inexorable truth is the temporality of decision making.

The turnover in an asset is the decision of the collectivity, the entry or exit point is your personal decision within the collectivity that may or may not be followed.

The first question: are you cornered or on the attack?

How many men/values ​​can you lose before you too get cornered, or before you can no longer do battle?

How much time, within your overall strategy, do you have before you have a win return? or before, in the imminent defeat, winning by attacking fiercely?

Anyway: what kind of commander do you feel you are?

Because courage is different from blind impulsiveness!

Because wisdom is different from abject passivity!

Because knowing and not doing is still not knowing! Confucius already said.

Having already won in its own truth is halfway to winning in the collective truth, what determines the loss or gain is the time reading of the actions taken!

Good war!