Usually, anyone who is a Star Wars fan does not like Star Trek very much and vice versa.

This condition is due, in part, to the way in which both science fiction titles treated earthly subjects:
star wars (those produced between 1977 and 1985) reality is presented as a short story with a technological cover and sword, with the moral of the story and everyone likes it
on the side you want. (that’s why Darth Vader became so popular). In the classic films of the original crew of strar trek (the producers in the 1980s of the 20th century)
the crew undoubtedly echoes the earthly fears of the 20th century: segregation, outright weapons, whales and ideological clashes with hints of futuristic technology.

This shows the narrative difference between two different styles, but eminently in the same cinematographic category: science fiction.

These two current pop icons were once niche restricted to nerdy circles.

Hoke, I think, even nerds became pop. Before rejected or relegated to the background, they occupy an imaginary that ranges from crazy mathematicians, heterodox scientists, crazy people who play RPG
even hackers who detonate the network. In common everyone has a taste for unpopular subjects always revolving around mathematics, physics, astronomy, computing, films and video games.

Nerds have graduate degrees and passions, but essentially they know certain concepts and never get confused. They study before, they have a certain knowledge to talk about the things that they love and
they are deeply upset in the confusion of concepts.

Obviously you don't have to be a nerd to play video games, or to play with your computer, or to discuss matrix-type cult movies.

But there is a great chance that the more this mixes with understanding how the game works, or knowing how to program and move more deeply into computers or discuss all the nuances of the matrix or, for example, see in an ionic engine that there is already nothing
more, nothing less, than the principle of operation of the folding motor of the enterprise and even a current hologram as equivalent to that of Princess Leia in the hologram asking for help to Kenobi not only throws you into the nerdy universe but starts to make you a nerd.

That is, for each person, one experiences, for each one experiences a concept of life and for the concept of life, ways of sustaining, living and interacting with other humans on the planet.

There are those who see cryptocurrencies as a way to make money, to get rich.

There are those who see cryptocurrencies as a way to increase existing assets.

There are those who operate cryptocurrencies as a day trade and their emotions of gaining 50% in one day.

But just as nerds are nerds and a false nerd is easily identified in the middle, people who do not understand the risks and do not study some fundamentals of the financial market, even the traditional one, are easily identified in the middle.

Forgetting the risks that DefI, day trade with cryptocurrencies and unknown pools can offer is confusing. And, rarely, confusion brings money.

Money in hand is a whirlwind and becomes a hurricane when greed overlaps with sobriety, not allowing you to see how long you leave the position or more: the time you don't get in any position.

Following the rules and some simple concepts makes financial losses just side effects, risks calculated from understanding the dynamics of this financial market. That is, if the daily goal was 10 and in the sum of the day it was 8, between gains and losses,
the person knows he will have, for example, to turn 12 the next day. Or, if it was prepared for a loss of 5 to 10%, it would remain calm to recover on the other days, or not move while there was volatility.

But the sloppy, without disciplines, who think that every day they can earn 200%, because they "feel" that they are going to win. They don't follow any of the discipline and planning that the financial market requires, these, when they have losses, actually don't lose, they throw money away.These people become emotionally unstable because they are not prepared to lose. Tantrum children who do not understand that they can not always win.

Planning, control, organization, discipline, knowledge of cause and effect in the real world, mathematical reasoning and emotional balance are requirements to be successful in the digital or traditional financial market.

Worse in digital, whose response is much faster, causing the loss of money to be greater and at a greater speed than in the traditional.

At this point you can think: I have none of that and yesterday I made a lot of money. It may be, but investing in these points and drawing up a plan of your rules, adapted to your answers (and not to ready-made formulas) will allow you to win more, or stop losing.

Even, stop losing a lot and just go to zero.

A simple inappropriate use of a mathematical tool already causes loss! (who never made a mistake between exponential and linear mathematical media?)

Wisdom is always the vectorial sum of time for the experience acquired by mistakes. And wisdom combined with discipline will prevent you from falling into many pitfalls.

To become good at something, all people were bad, to a greater or lesser degree, regardless of their level of education. Schooling only serves to have more mental tools and to be able to succeed faster.

Gold pen does not make a best seller, education does not make champions but both help to grow faster.

Study, study, study and do not confuse the concepts. Making mistakes is part and learning from mistakes is what makes money (or recoup losses!).