Publication in Russian on the Zen blog
https://dzen.ru/a/Z7RVF1h0fRy8r-Sx
History speaks for itself: Russia must surrender unconditionally.
Now is not the time to allow the darkness to rewrite history in favor of a negotiated settlement - this does not happen with Russia. History has shown that despotic imperialism must be resolutely resisted. If we really strive to make the world a better place, then the only fair result is the unconditional surrender of the aggressor.
During the Second World War, nothing less than complete surrender was accepted. Why should humanity lower its ethical standards now? Instead of compromising with imperialist ambitions, we must rise to the ideals that propel humanity forward. Let's learn from history and ensure that justice prevails - not only today, but also for future generations.
In this post, I want to talk about historical parallels with the Second World War and what is currently happening in Russia in terms of expanding geopolitical expansion. I think there are several worthy historical parallels. This is Japan, this is Germany, as well as other countries. Japan has developed something called the East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere. In Germany, there was an idea under the auspices of Lean Manufacturing or shared living space. Russian russians, in particular in Moscow, believe in the idea of the top of the world and the creation of a common Eurasian space, the basis for the prosperity of which lies at the heart of the Russian idea, in a kind of philosophy based on the concept of peace for Russians. In Germany and Japan, there was an idea that they needed to create a sphere of influence, a buffer zone, and, for example, if you know the history, in the 1940s, earlier in the 1930s and in the 1920s, there was the Tokugawa regime in Japan, when Japan was expanding across the Pacific islands and into In the Asian region, about a quarter of the Japanese forces were concentrated in the Pacific Ocean, and most of them on the Asian mainland. The idea behind the expansion of the Pacific Ocean was to create a buffer zone to prevent invasion of Japanese territory. Germany did the same during the larger land campaign, when they created allies such as Hungary, Italy and Romania and other countries that were strategic and economic allies, and then they continued to expand into North Africa, where they also needed a buffer zone from the mainland. Therefore, the idea of creating a sphere of influence and a buffer zone is that each country, in its own way, feels better and superior than others. The Germans felt better than the Japanese. And Russia treats the Germans with superiority. At least as far as Moscow is concerned, where an ideological idea for expansion is being created, expansion is justified in front of other countries by protecting people who speak their native language and belong to the same culture. You know, the Germans devastated Poland because they felt that their fellow tribesmen were being oppressed. And it's an obvious shame when people don't take it seriously, some people swallow it in relation to Russia. Because they accept similar justifications for expansion, which have more than one parallel in history. One striking difference is that during World War II, the Allies called for unconditional surrender at the Atlantic Conference in 1941 (Atlantic Charter, Declaration of the United States and Great Britain) and later at the Casablanca Conference in 1943 (secret negotiations between the United States and Great Britain). There was an unequivocal call for unconditional surrender. There were no negotiations. Only the demands of surrender. No negotiations can be conducted. There are no such things as "making progress in negotiations," "negotiating," or "talking" with the Russian government, this is an absolute illusion. I don't know if these people who make such statements believe it, or if they are illiterate and not familiar with the history of mankind, or if they don't understand the psychology of the "Dust Spot" with abnormal brain formation, in which capillary damage may have been caused by children's karate and street fights. This is often observed neurologically and clinically. You can digress into the topic of academic research, in which there is something like a dichotomy between normal behavior, aggressive behavior and calculating behavior. Therefore, I don't quite understand what those who call it "conversation" and "negotiations" are calling for, when historically no one even mentioned negotiations with the Nazi leader in Germany in the 1940s. I mean, you wouldn't call him on the phone when the aggressor is at the stage of developing nuclear-armed missiles. And as for Russia, they are also worried about nuclear weapons, but listen to me, nuclear weapons are the least of the problems. Nowadays, biological drugs are much more effective, which overshadows any nuclear threat. That's why the Russians are playing for the long term now. And there is no such thing as "negotiations," "conversations," or "making progress in negotiations." Whenever you hear someone say that we are making progress, you have to understand what is going on. The tsar of Russia says, "Oh, you know, I don't want to negotiate." And people say, "Oh, we can convince him by talking a little more and negotiating, and something like that." What they don't understand is that from a conceptual point of view, what is happening here and now is a dead end, as in the case of Nazi Germany and militaristic Japan. These are despots who are not being negotiated with. If someone thinks they are making progress, they are deceiving themselves. I'm not sure if such people are familiar with history at all, or if they really think they're making progress, or if there's another reason. But the term "making progress through negotiations" looks impossible and really strange to a person who has studied history. For a person whose brain has not been damaged since childhood and who has studied history lessons, the concepts of such ideals as law and justice should be understandable. Just like at the Atlantic Conference and the Casablanca conference, there should be only one call for Moscow's unconditional surrender. And, as I have already said in previous publications, this should include something related to nuclear disarmament, biological disarmament, and possibly other requirements. And if you think this sounds far-fetched and unrealistic, then it's not, because look at Japan and Germany, they are the EU's greatest allies today, and the economic benefits of peace dividends are exponential compared to if we had negotiations with a dictator. And when you ask how this can be achieved, I will tell you that there are 300 billion dollars of money from the oligarchs that I can send directly to Ukraine, and this is step number one. The second step is to continue providing support, including humanitarian aid. To do everything as they did during the World War. After that, the world in the Free World was better. Think about it, live in it. The sphere of prosperity in Asia, the places where people died, the imperialism behind it, and military adventurism, did our fathers and grandfathers, whom we respect, think about this, would they leave everything as it is when evil defeats good? Were they going to lose so easily if they saw that evil could take over part of the world for its own purposes of profit and exploitation of people, or would they do something? Some people call the previous generation the greatest, but you know, I've never liked that term, because every generation has a chance to become great, to move towards the ideals of a better world, towards the ideals of something bigger. Now some people living in Russia could object to me that they are the most moral people, but this is the most incorrect argument that I have seen, and there will be a publication about it next time, but they are not guided by high ideals. Christianity, orthodoxy, call it what you want, imperialism, evil, but Washington should either just admit its cowardice, or say, or they should say that they cannot negotiate with a dictator, not because they do not want to, but because it is physically impossible, it is the same as negotiating with a snake that wriggles and attacks you. Either you hit her and she crawls away, or you run away on your own. Washington is running right now. Instead, Washington should have called for Moscow's unconditional surrender, and if that didn't happen, then allocate $300 billion in aid as the first step, and then the second step would have become much larger. Take a lesson from the Second World War, take a lesson from history and from what economic benefits the world is getting now with those people who were once enemies and now have become friends, I mean, it's pretty simple, and the best way to defeat the enemy is to make him your friend, and Russia She's not in friendship mode right now, so she should be called upon to surrender unconditionally.
Where did this sudden desire to negotiate with terrorists come from? Why negotiate with a famous psychopath? Who will ask Trump, Vance, and Kellogg this question: "Why didn't the United States negotiate with ISIS and Osama bin Laden?"
Unfortunately, this will not happen with Trump in power. Now he says he wants to get Ukrainian resources in exchange for help, and how shameful that is.
It is absurd how much official Washington seems to buy into ideas like "Ukraine should hold new elections" when the whole problem here is that Russia has not had free and fair elections for 20 years.
If Russia had been subjected to unconditional surrender, followed by the Marshall Plan, the Russian "little people" would immediately have been in a better position.
Russia is negotiating on many issues, but they NEVER honor the agreement reached and ALWAYS accuse the other side of violating the agreement.Russia does not negotiate and NEVER complies with their agreements, NEVER
War is a business. We have morality, but those who advocate war for profit don't.
Behind-the-scenes deals between the United States and Russia
I write and shoot. Join me
Author's video content CMCproduction & SmartREC video studios
https://www.youtube.com/c/ViolettaWennman
Highly Social on Zen
https://dzen.ru/shipshard
I invite you to the uncensored telegram channel.
https://t.me/shipshard
The weakness of the Russian economy in comparison with the United Europe and Ukraine. The results are shown in the table below. Using economic data, PPP (purchasing power parity), military index, and GDP (adjusted for realism), I made a numerical comparison as if the geopolitical situation were presented in a game simulator.
United, Europe can easily stand up to Russia without the United States. Therefore, Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, and other sane countries must work together to defend themselves against the United States and its new owners.
Separately, it should be noted against arguments for China, for those who believe that it is an ally of Russia, in fact, China's largest export market is the European Union, and China's second largest export market is the United States of America, so China's industrial centers also go to Europe and the United States, but not to Russia.
Join me in the telegram channel https://t.me/shipshard I'm not a blogger. At the moment, my main activity is studying at the Eindhoven Academy of Arts + working as a cameraman, producer at the CMCproduction video studio. In the telegram channel, I'm just sharing my thoughts. This applies to politics, economics, sociology, philosophy, and some knowledge of natural sciences. Most of the information about me is posted on TG or you can just Google my full name Violetta Wennman. Good mood and strength to all!
