Who Loves You?

Who Loves You?

By Nathan Payne | pablosmoglives | 27 Jan 2026


After watching the videos below, both of which I generally agree with, I would like to make a couple quick points.  I have been saying for years that the world is POST-POLITICAL, and since you can't vote, riot, or shoot your way out of the book of Revelation, the first priority for everyone should be to get right with God.

So, what's the point?

The first point is this.  If you can walk into any room full of liberals and get a LEGAL DEFINITION of a right, I would be amazed.  The point is so old it starved to death at least 15 years ago.  People on whatever is supposedly the right these days have a better idea of what a right is (though they'd probably still waste their time fighting "gay rights" instead of taking the wiser route of advocating for "minority-group privileges;" if "gay rights" activists changed their platform to "gay privileges," I'd probably support them, for no other reason than that they'd be accurate, legally-speaking, and would divert the conversation about rights back to what they ACTUALLY ARE, as opposed to what the government and assorted Marxist ideologues want us to believe they are)...... But.... What was I talking about?

Ah yes.  The tangent on a loop, of course.  Let me just repost the entirety of the article "Rights Over Privilege," which I felt was overdue when I wrote it in early 2019, but which I felt should be stated for the intellectual record anyway.  7 years ago, already?  It's not much of an article.  It's really just an observation.  One which is remedial, basic, and fundamental.  This is it:

RIGHTS OVER PRIVILEGE

Legally speaking, there is no such thing as minority-group rights.  There are only human rights.  Legally speaking, such things as “gay rights” and “women’s rights” don’t exist.  Dogmatically speaking, there is a broad spectrum of opinion and belief on the subject, but legally speaking, which is the only thing that matters, there is no such thing as minority-group rights.  There are only minority-group privileges.

A right is something that can only be exercised by any given individual in real time on the spot, regardless of what anybody thinks about it.  When Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus, she didn’t go downtown to get a permit for it, which is to say, she didn’t pay for the privilege of staying seated.  She simply stayed seated.  She exercised her human right, not her privilege.

A privilege is something that must be granted by a legal authority greater than the individual.  To get married in the United States, for example, it is necessary to get a license.  You must pay for a license to be granted the legal privilege to enter a different tax status.  Legally speaking, this is not a right.

It doesn’t matter what anybody thinks about it, because this is a basic legal fact.

Whatever anybody thinks about gay marriage, the legal fact remains that marriage of any kind in our society is not a right.  Rights cannot be granted.  They can only be exercised.  Privileges, however, must be granted.  They are legally incapable of being exercised.

Generally, it is necessary to pay for a permit or license to be granted the privilege to drive, for example, or get married, or do almost anything.  This has happened because almost everybody believes in minority-group rights, which significantly decreases the number of people who are defending actual legal rights.

Of course, this is not a coincidence.  One way that our rights have been destroyed is by making everybody believe they’re defending them, when in actual legal fact they are defending the privileges of a select few.  The privilege to enter into a new tax status, usually.

There is no such thing as minority-group rights, only minority-group privileges.  This is a legal statement, not a dogmatic one.  If you “choose to believe otherwise,” you are being played like a sucker.

 

*                    *                    *

 

So, to answer the question of why elements of the so-called MAGA movement are "suddenly anti-2A," it's obviously because the left has been brainwashed to the point that even their leaders probably couldn't tell you what a right is, so that, when (not if) the rights of these smug, dismissive social-engineering projects are trampled on, nobody will care.

Any "anti-2A" sentiment on the right is a manufactured reaction to the manufactured ignorance and rage of people who have been brainwashed to hate themselves and each other into fighting for the privilege of a bunch of sexually-incontinent theocrats to enter a TAX STATUS.

It's boring on its face.

 

"The Sex Theocracy has made America (and most of the West) completely
and entirely uncool. There is nothing cool about the rainbow flag.
It is an ugly thing, reminiscent of people who can't tell the
difference in happiness and BEING HIGH ON COCAINE."
Sex Theocracy & The Uncooling of America

 

In our society, marriage is a privilege, not a right.  Legally speaking.  So, if I was dumb enough to ever get married again, I would be inclined to do it Braveheart-style.  A couple in the woods with their love, their vows, and a witness with a book.  The union is between free individuals, and is none of the state's business.  At least it shouldn't be.  And while I would use the Bible, any book would probably do.

Dr. Seuss, perhaps.

f9e5b45bba3356f92fb9c33c8746f5ecad1c52ef24aef716837734416f00e732.png

"There is no place I'd rather be, than hanging out, just you and me."

You may kiss the bride.

d800b71cb083d57768019c057adb259c5b7586bc89587ac07e40a9b3024b7817.jpg

Something else may occur to me later, but the only other obvious, readily-apparent thing I want to say for the time being is that while I genuinely appreciate the attempts of the guys in the videos above to stay true to the US Constitution and defend the rights of social-engineering projects who would murder them in their sleep for being free individuals, and the points they make are true, and deserve to be repeated,

Does anybody really think that the people rioting in Minneapolis are going to suddenly have a CONSTITUTIONAL AWAKENING, out of the blue, after decades of being told that privileges are rights?  Spontaneously, like a Shakespearean soliloquy performed on the subway by a junkie with Tourette's, the Minneapolis rioters are going to start respecting actual human rights, for everyone, out of nowhere.  While consumed by a manufactured rage that is both comical and deadly, and a firmly-manufactured belief that other people's privilege to enter a TAX STATUS is a RIGHT.

Honestly, that would be great.  But I'm not going to commit suicide by holding my breath.

3271410df023596e93c8005a13806d2c3b001fc7679522c69795660e982d06a9.jpg

And anyway, don't the protestors have the general vibe of the girl protesting in I, Pet Goat II?  All righteous and hardcore about their cause, until the puppet master taps them on the shoulder, and they turn around and immediately lose all heart?

They do.  It's almost like we were told this was going to happen.

So, in closing... the only thing I can think to say is, God have mercy on us all.  ICE agents, rioters.... everyone on the inside-out, the outside-in, and the outer, crazy fringes.  High and low and in between.  You can't vote, riot, or shoot your way out of the book of Revelation.  2 people are (probably) in hell right now who wouldn't have been, if they had kept (or gained) their focus.  More are on the way.  Get right with God while you can.

Who loves you, really, anyway?

It isn't Satan.

Thanks for listening.

How do you rate this article?

13


Nathan Payne
Nathan Payne

I am a songwriter and bandleader who travels the world in search of the golden ticket. https://nathan-payne.wixsite.com/home


pablosmoglives
pablosmoglives

Replacing my blog at http://pablosmoglives.wordpress.com

Publish0x

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.