Buckle up, Moonbats, it's about to get frighteningly small in here! I will endeavor to keep this one to a minimum length while allowing for a sense of the depth of the details.
This is also going to loop back to connect with two of my previous posts as the fact-based "conspiracy theorizing" goes nanoscale. After all, isn't everything connected in some way?
As I like to say, "the head bone is connected to the ass bone" and some people will never experience a break between the two. However, fortunately for us Moonbats, I am here to perform a bit of psychic surgery and extricate the head bones from our posterior region to preserve these thoughts for posterity.
Perhaps you have already made the leap of logic and connected the headline to my previous post "Fauci's Pet Worm: Parasites, Pandemics and Pornography" in which case I reward you with a gold star; congratulations! If you are not already familiar with the facts outlined in that article, then, you may be shocked by how insidious microbiology and biotechnology can become. [1]
As Fauci's Pet Worm was merely an overview and some uncomfortable questions, there were several connected items from my knowledge base which had to be left out for the sake of brevity. One of those items is shockingly small, though it could have easily doubled the length of that report.
So, what's this about chemomechanical worms?
You can be forgiven if it slipped by without your noticing during the peak panic of the media pandemic propaganda, but, in November of 2020 it was reported that researchers at Johns-Hopkins University had developed a novel drug delivery technology. [2-6]
This drug delivery system is a micro technology based on the biology of parasitic worms. To be more specific, it mimics the hookworm's method for attachment to mucus membranes.
What they developed is a microscopic star-shaped six-pointed shape-changing chemomechanical device that is referred to as a therapeutic gripper (shortened to theragripper).
Several reports refer to theragrippers as being made of metal and coated with paraffin, but more specifically "theragrippers are constructed from rigid poly(propylene fumarate) segments and stimuli-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hinges." [7]
After insertion into the body of the target, the paraffin coating is melted away as the theragrippers reach body temperature and this causes the hinges to activate. The hinges cause the points of the star-shape to grab ahold of the mucus membrane into which they were inserted, whether that be the nasal passages or the intestinal tract, in the same way that a hookworm attaches itself to a host body.
Thousands of these theragrippers can be delivered on a single cotton swab. This swab may be inserted by way of the nose or, what has been determined to be a more effective method for the purposes of drug delivery, through the anus. [2,8]
Nano-nano, Mork! Shazbots in your shazbutt! [Editors note: For you kids, that's a reference to the early work of the late Robin Williams.]
So... are you not already making a connection to the reports of Covid testing using an anal swab? Isn't it curious that at the same time that the existence of theragripper drug delivery was being reported China began anal swab testing for the dreaded virus? Quite the coincidence, eh? Yes, especially when the CCP demanded anal swabbing of foreign diplomats and Olympic athletes. [9-14]
You may recall that the corporate media made claims that, although uncomfortable and perhaps embarrassing, anal swabbing was the best and most accurate method of testing for the dreaded virus. Never mind that several medical experts questioned whether an anal swab was the best method of testing for active infection, the corporate media was determined to make certain that you were being prepared to accept having a swab inserted in your rectum. What you may have missed, since the corporate media didn't follow up, is that the study upon which that claim rested was subsequently retracted. Yes, sure, it was eventually republished...with a correction stating that informed consent had been obtained retrospectively. [15-19]
Do you get that? The CCP scientists tested anal swabbing without informed consent, then requested consent to publish the results after the fact. Why not get informed consent beforehand? Was that simply because Chinese researchers aren't concerned about informed consent or because there was something else being tested which was not described in the published paper? Do you really think that the CCP care about informed consent and ethical conduct in their pursuit of science any more than their pursuit of political or strategic military goals?
Well, lest you think that the technology is too new to have been implemented for nefarious purposes so soon, I have to inform you that it wasn't developed in 2020. The development of theragripper technology was reported in March of 2014. That provides six additional years of testing and development to perfect the technology. [7]
And, if you don't already know, yes, Chinese researchers and laboratories have been involved in the development of nanobot technology. [20-22]
Now, if these chemomechanical first generation nanobots can deliver drugs into the human body, they can certainly also be used to deliver viral particles, mRNA or an entire virus. And, if they can be concealed and carried on a simple cotton swab, they could also be surreptitiously delivered under the guise of a Covid test.
I am not suggesting that this is being done, merely pointing out that it is not out of the realm of possibility. And, doesn't that make you think a little more about the reports of Covid test kits being contaminated thereby producing what is claimed to be false positive results? The corporate media claims that the test swabs were not contaminated with the virus, but do you trust them to tell the truth? I have noticed that the reports use the word "contaminated" but don't explain the nature of the contamination or the name of the contaminating substance. That's a little suspicious, yes? [23,24]
If you are thinking that it's not possible for nanoparticles to deliver mRNA, I direct you again to Johns-Hopkins from where it was reported in January 2022 that nanoparticles can indeed be utilized to deliver mRNA. More specifically, it has been reported that researchers "administered biodegradable nanoparticles carrying mRNA that encoded a gene called luciferase". That's beyond the scope of this examination but is a signpost to a rabbit hole we can explore together another day. [25]
In another connection to Fauci's Pet Worm, according to the British Medical Journal, "the oro-fecal route is well-documented in patients affected by SARS-Cov-19." So, ass eaters beware, due to your sexual proclivities you are more likely to contract the dreaded virus than those who are non-vaccinated and refrain from such sexual activity, even if your partner is asymptomatic, producing antibodies and tested negative with a nasal swab; because, like all viruses, Covid is excreted in the feces and will continue to be excreted after the infected person has recovered. This could also explain how the dreaded virus infects both the intestinal tract and the respiratory tract but not always both simultaneously. [26]
Earlier I stated that this nanotechnology could be connected to two of my previous posts and you may be wondering what the second one is. That would be the sixth installment in my Fentanyl Fever series in which I mentioned that, although certain forms of air pollution from China had decreased during the lockdown of 2020, particulate matter being emitted from China and crossing the Pacific ocean to pollute the air of the western states of the USA had not decreased. It's a possibility that some of that particulate matter could be nanoparticles aerosolized and intentionally distributed. [27]
Again, I am not alleging that this is what has happened, but I am asking you to consider and realize that it is a distinct possibility. If the dreaded virus were delivered via chemomechanical nanoparticles which had been aerosolized then dispersed into the atmosphere and carried on the jetstream, that would go a long way to bolster the appearance of the virus being more widely spread through airborne transmission than it may actually be. It's something to think about at the least.
We are constantly chided by the corporate media to always "trust the Science!" However, genuine science is not afraid of questions no matter how far out there they may seem to be. Genuine science does not require the censorship of unorthodox thought in order to "protect the truth."
Do you really want to trust the corporate media when they insist that such technology would never be used for anything but benevolent health conscious purposes when they have been repeatedly revealed to have willfully deceived us about the most current dreaded virus and myriad other health conditions? Do you really want to trust alleged experts featured in the corporate media knowing that they are funded by the same Big Pharma companies which are responsible for the epidemic of opioid addiction which caused the overdose deaths of more than 100,000 Americans in a 12 month span and pushed aside that fact in favor of sensational reports about the dreaded virus? Don't you think we should all be asking more questions such as these I have presented here? [28]
We are not supposed to trust in science, we are supposed to question and verify.
I, for one, will continue to take a scientific approach and question everything. Until next time, Moonbats, do your best to expand your mind farther than your belly and don't let the worms drag you down.
- Marvin Scott Marvin, March 4, 2022
Since the Publish0x editor insists on scrambling the order of the references, I am including the references here:
[3] https://ventures.jhu.edu/news/johns-hopkins-engineer-theragrippers-drugs-gi-tract/
[4] https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/11/25/theragripper-gi-tract-medicine-delivery/
[6] https://www.science.org/toc/sciadv/6/44
[7] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.201311047
[8] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abb4133
[9] https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210128/china-using-anal-swabs-for-covid-testing
[12] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-diplomats-china-subjected-anal-swab-testing-covid-19-n1258844
[13] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56245404
[14] https://www.the-sun.com/news/4512129/china-anal-swabs-covid-mandatory-winter-olympics/
[15] https://m.dw.com/en/anal-covid-19-swabs-in-china-we-just-dont-know-if-its-necessary/a-56789975
[17] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-testing-idUSKBN29W1RN
[18] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493721/
[19] https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/fmb-2020-0090c1
[20] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adhm.202001681
[21] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01234
[22] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8593790
[24] https://doh.wa.gov/newsroom/state-recalls-12000-covid-19-test-kits-due-possible-contamination
[26] https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1470/rr-1
[27] https://www.publish0x.com/moonbat-dives/fentanyl-fever-part-6-of-6-xelejdp?a=5xe7LvNra7
[28] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2021/20211117.htm
