In Part 1, we explored how Chainers presents MRO tasks as micro‑work supposedly connected to external companies, while paying players only with internal currency. Now, in Part 2, we go deeper — into the Offerwalls, the FREE CFB system, and the internal token economy that Chainers uses to reward players.

This analysis is based on the official Earn page you currently have open, where Chainers promotes its reward system and explains how tasks work. For example, the page explicitly displays “FREE $CFB” and invites players to “PLAY, COMPLETE TASKS, AND EARN REWARDS” .

Let’s break down what this really means.

  🟩 1. “FREE CFB” — The Internal Token With No External Value

On the Earn page, Chainers highlights FREE $CFB, the internal token used for all rewards. The FAQ section asks directly: “What is $CFB?” .

But here’s the key point:

CFB is NOT a cryptocurrency.

It is not listed, not tradable, not withdrawable, and not convertible into real money.

It is simply:

• an internal game token,

• controlled entirely by Chainers,

• with value only inside the game’s closed economy.

This means that even if tasks come from real external companies (surveys, data collection, marketing actions), the player receives no real monetary compensation — only CFB.

  🟦 2. Offerwalls — The Core of the Reward System

The page states clearly: “This is the offerwall — here you’ll find extra tasks. Complete them to earn rewards!” .

Offerwalls are a known system used by many apps and games. They usually include:

• surveys

• app installs

• sign‑ups

• micro‑tasks

• marketing actions

In the real world, these tasks are paid in actual money by advertisers.

But in Chainers:

• the player receives CFB,

• Chainers receives real money (if partnerships exist),

• and the player cannot convert CFB into anything outside the game.

This creates a one‑way value flow:

• External companies → Chainers (money)

• Chainers → Player (internal token)

The player is effectively doing real paid work, but receiving non‑monetary compensation.

  🟧 3. The FAQ Reveals the System’s Weak Points

The Earn page contains multiple FAQ entries that raise red flags:

“How do I complete Offers?”

The game explains how to perform tasks but does not clarify the nature of the compensation.

“How long does it take to receive my reward?”

Rewards are internal tokens only.

“My reward hasn’t been credited.”

A common issue in offerwalls — but here, the reward is not money, only CFB.

“Why was my reward declined?”

Again, typical of offerwalls, but the player has no financial protection because the reward is not monetary.

“Why do my friends have tasks I don’t?”

Offerwalls often vary by region, but Chainers does not disclose how tasks are sourced.

All of this shows a lack of transparency about:

• who provides the tasks,

• who pays for them,

• and why players receive only internal tokens.

  🟥 4. The Legal and Ethical Problem

If external companies pay Chainers for user actions, then Chainers is receiving real money.

But players receive:

• no money,

• no crypto,

• no withdrawable asset,

• only CFB, an internal token.

This raises serious questions:

• Is the player performing real paid work without real pay?

• Is the reward system intentionally ambiguous?

• Does the “FREE CFB” marketing mislead users into thinking they are earning something valuable?

• Are affiliates unknowingly promoting a system that resembles a closed‑loop reward trap?

These questions matter because Chainers markets itself as a Web3 project — but its reward system is not Web3, not crypto, and not financially transparent.

  📚 Conclusion of Part 2

In this second part, we uncovered:

• the true nature of CFB as a non‑crypto internal token,

• how Offerwalls generate real value for Chainers but not for players,

• how the FAQ reveals structural weaknesses and ambiguity,

• and why this system raises ethical concerns.

The Earn page makes it clear that Chainers rewards players only with internal tokens, despite using tasks that normally pay real money in other platforms.

  ➡️ Coming Next: Part 3 — Final Verdict, Risks, and How to Protect Players and Affiliates

In the final part, we will cover:

• whether this model violates EU consumer protection rules,

• whether it resembles deceptive reward systems,

• how affiliates can avoid promoting misleading platforms,

• and the final conclusion of the investigation.