This is a particularly difficult topic. I haven't gained the benefit of anyone else's understanding of it, so I'm just going to write the concepts several different ways. They all say the same thing. If you're not reading it that way it's because I'm not the best writer. Sorry, self!
1. Among processes in focusing verisimilitude is the identification of similarities, or approximations, of desire.* Desire informs orientation of coordinates used by corpus to determine its relationships to active consensuses. When information influences a consensus, a consensual structure modifies to include any new datricies it validates. New and differing structures, at their bases, inform inclined structures. Inclined structures expand capacities to include new validating structures, strengthening consensus and corpus thereby.
If you're unsure of what you want, no matter whether it's the most intense of any serious, or least of any casual, desire, just consider the above. It's pedantic, but it'll get to the point, and then your body will probably just figure it out from there.
*Desire is a mental interpretation of corpus to the extent it's not imposed and informed by a projection of externality/ies. To the extent I realize time, the interpretation is an approximation. To the extent I realize corpus' eternal structure, interpretation is calibrated. Everything in between is corpus' continuing structure, which allows for such interpretation.
2. Here's where mindfulness helps: The more a consensus influences desires, the less verisimilitude focuses, though not necessarily vice versa. This concept explains spirituality as simply as possible. Accordingly, practice focusing verisimilitude causes corpus to respond to the desires of the mind and those of itself, as assigned by the mind*, which fortifies corpus. Each desire is accommodated. The body's experience can confirm, and thereby conform, to any such structure it desires as to any consensus.
*The level of agency over one's mind can be identified through an analysis of whether or not the actions of a body, as it responds to corporeal desire, as informed and fortified, align with those of separate and distinct intention consenses in mutualizing capacities. Using a term like "like-mind" allows me to approximate this with at least enough accuracy for this blog. There's more to it; it's a giant paraphrase.
Focusing verisimilitude temporarily ignores, but is informed and guided by, consenses in relation to desire toward identification of being. Knowledge arising through being further informs and validates consenses, fortifying corpus and environs. The more fortified the corpus, the more efficiently knowledge propounds, and stronger consenses become. As newly propounded knowledge informs consenses, they improve and result in shifts toward improving conditions for desire with respect to relevant coordinating and responsive datricies.
3. If we're looking at the forest, social nature provides numerous consenses and consensuses, each with at least many passive qualities that are both voluntarily and involuntarily passive. Consensus structures that do not immediately conform to propounded knowledge that validate are simply absorbed therethrough, and the consensus structures that then conform to what they have newly absorbed thereby allow for such, with or without latency, as the case may be depending on the nuance of the desire affecting itself in response to its applicable consensus structure's desire for fortification and continuance. Strengthening desire is, then, a requirement of the fortification of one's existence. Desires that are abundantly beneficial in mutualizing capacities are those that produce happiness. It's a simple equation: Feel good and you'll feel good.
Don't let the small stuff fool you into the possibilities that may produce the misidentification of your own desires. Those who present ignorance with respect to the possibilities of your desires exist only to clarify your desires insofar as those such desires exist. Running down someone's rabbit hole who had not themselves encoded it into our shared, enduring existence's possibilities produces circumstances that are more trial than benefit. Allowing influence of such over a persona erodes its knowledgeable qualities from the basis of its mens. Doing so temporarily disintegrates corporeal awareness from operation. (Orpheus either turned around or he didn't. If post-modern art has taught humanity anything it's that the basis of the reliance upon allegory that destroys brings opportunities toward alternative possibilities.)
The ability of a consensus structure to understand ineluctable desire requires an understanding of time's eluctable elementary dimensional relationships that, at their bases, are informed through survival of corporeality itself. In other words, there's no need to read up on anything when it comes to that as it's a multikaleidofactoreal, albeit relative, concept. However, only the body affects corpus through mind's* operations; consensus is not solely corporeal, and is not necessarily the sole Influencive factor compelling production over a corpus insofar as it's possible to correlate awareness through scientific awareness of the patterns of vibrations that correspond awarenesses that expand in factors that bubble around one's own time position as a nominally locative structure in relation to the originations of such patterns throughout both timespace and spacetime.
*See supra.
4. Verisimilitude, in part, identifies intellectually connective nuances. Identify nuance if you're looking for something to do. Once a consensus structure defines it own survival using more expansive parameters than it would have a current capacity to process and therefore understand, its survival expands therethrough, which then results in greater sustainability of its own structure.
Consensus structures that exclude their validated concepts fail by virtue of their own rules while attempting to impose them. Imposition conceptually destroys active consensus. So, by all means, if you don't like something, identify the nuance that has already destroyed its possibility, and recalibrate such consensus however you'd like using corporeal, and not the body's, desire. Or just get some popcorn and watch as others impose views on each other that destroy their own consensuses. It's not pleasant, but it's something to do with yourself at least.
Alternatively said, living lies destroys corpus's natural inclination to predicate its connection with an organism in maintenance of the things that would best support it. Being oneself fortifies such predicative connection.
5. It is possible only to a reasonable extent to de-validate belief and reassign any related datricies that compose truth into knowledge, understanding, realization, genuity, and other further validating concepts. If you want to; your call. And even if you don't want to, I already did. So you don't have to even if you don't want to have to care to. Easier that way probably. Ok, bye.
