Introduction

Yesterday, I wrote an article covering some of Anthony Fauci's emails that were published under FOIA. The emails revealed that he was well aware of the possibility that SARS-Cov-2 could've been engineered and that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was likely performing gain-of-function research. In addition, an email revealed that from 2014-2019, the NIAID invested $826,277 to the Wuhan lab on bat coronaviruses with EcoHealth Alliance as the middle-man. The president of that non-profit organization thanked Fauci for "debunking" the lab leak hypothesis in public even though privately, Fauci took it seriously.

As of writing that article, I came across some additional weird developments as well as some disturbing discoveries regarding Fauci.

Anderson's "Auto-Deleted" Tweets

Let's shift attention to one of the virologists who hypothesized to Fauci that SARS-Cov-2 might have been engineered, Dr. Kristian Anderson. To recap, in February 1, 2020, before the country even began to lock things down, Anderson sent an email to Fauci that the virus's genome was "inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory" and some of its sequences appeared to be engineered (p. 3187).

However, approximately 1.5 months later, he published a paper on Nature stating the exact opposite. He concluded that the virus was not a laboratory construct. If you already read my previous article, you would be aware of the fact that other scientists determined that the virus had features that could not have possibly evolved naturally. This included the Indian paper that was suspiciously retracted the same day Fauci dismissed it in an email (political pressure, perhaps?), scientists from Nankai University, and scientists Dr. Angus Dalgleish and Dr. Birger Sørensen's upcoming paper.

And that was not all. About 5 months after the publication, Anderson received $1.88 million in CREID funding (and Peter Daszak also received $1.54 million).

With all of this hoopla going on, Anderson began to act very strangely on Twitter. As one user pointed out, over the course of last week, Anderson deleted approximately five thousand tweets. And when people were pointing out at his suspicious behavior, he provided an even more suspicious excuse.

I'm sorry, but... what? Tweets don't auto-delete. Anyways, people didn't buy his reason and as a result, Anderson deleted his entire account. Whether he tried to cover up something that may be incriminating, we don't know, but Wayback machine may help. Who knows...?

A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy?

As I went deeper into this matter, I ran into a random comment on the internet claiming that Fauci removed the federal ban on gain-of-function research in 2017 and in that same year, he predicted that under Trump's administration, there would be a "surprise outbreak".

I searched this up and I was surprised at how true this person's claim turned out. In January 2017, during a forum at Georgetown University, Fauci said that there was "no doubt" that under the Trump administration there would be a "surprise outbreak".

Fauci's speech at Georgetown University in video format.

I checked the other half of the person's claim and indeed, the Fauci-led NIH lifted the federal ban on gain-of-function research in December 2017.

So to recap, at the beginning of 2017, right before Trump took office, Fauci predicted that there would be a "surprise outbreak". Later on that same year, he lifted the federal ban on gain-of-function research. The NIH invested hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. To quote a part of my previous article regarding the Wuhan lab:

In February 1, 2020, Fauci sent an urgent email to Hugh Auchincross, telling him to read a paper on SARS gain of function (p. 3221). Later that day, Auchincross replied back stating that the experiments from the paper were performed before the NIH's gain of function pause. He also told Fauci that he would ask if the NIH had any ties to the work abroad (p.3206).

Closing Thoughts

There's definitely something fishy going on here. From Kristian Anderson doing a sudden heel-turn on the lab leak hypothesis to him deleting his tweets and eventually his entire account to his $1.88 million in CREID funding, I have many suspicions on him. Discovering Anthony Fauci's Georgetown University's speech on a "surprise outbreak" was chilling and even more so when he lifted the federal ban on gain-of-function research that same year.

Overall, Fauci and his colleagues have some major 'splainin to do.