I've been thinking a lot about this past post 'FT apologizes for +10 years of wrong Bitcoin reporting' and what the implications really are for the millions of people they brainwash.

It's not for nothing you know, the billions of profound quotes regarding the media. But regarding that specific reporting, FT basically impoverished its readers both intellectually and literally. Does that financial advice stuff also work in reverse? Can FT readers now sue them for false financial advice by their own admission? Can they say we even paid for your content and because of you we missed out on 1K Bitcoin, 10K Bitcoin but only now when it's already at 100K you tell us you were wrong? Can they say all your headlines when Bitcoin was crashing, and still negative framing even when Bitcoin was rising influenced me to miss out, so pay up? **** no!

But it doesn't stop there and this quote here was so ahead of its time, it often makes me wonder when and where these ''journalists'' will draw the line.

Now it's one thing trying to vilify the politician, the currency or platform you don't like in favor of the one you prefer, because one will maintain the established-mess and the other will reshape policies and try to bring about actual change. But it's something entirely different trying to seek sympathy for a racist genocide maniac who sided with isis/daesh in their quest to eliminate all non-sunni minorities in Syria and Iraq.

''Gosh I wonder who that could be'' you ask? Oh just the man who'd been plastered on every major Western media the past week.

Wow, I actually agree with the Washington post for a change, he indeed does symbolize this new Syrian terrorist ''revolution.''

Look, merely saying you side with isis/daesh is not worthy of a death sentence. Threatening to kill people of other cultures/religions does also not qualify for the death penalty and to be quite honest I'm not in favor of torture prisons or the death sentence in general, but does that mean this was some poor random victim who just so happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and the one being oppressed? ***** no, there are some images and videos from the region in the same time this guy was saying these things that will literally make you puke. Those were the actual victims over there.

Here's one of his videos translated to English and it's worth to note that anti-Assad Syrians also look down on him, so why is Western mainstream media trying to portray him like some sort of a hero?

I can't begin to phantom how the non-terrorist citizens of Iraq and Syria must feel witnessing all this after everything they've been put through by these same barbarians. Witnessing how they are now being portrayed as some sort of victim, witnessing how the literal 2nd in command of isis/daesh is now put in charge of Syria.

But hey, he was just young and emotional or something. Let's all be kind and show love to the terrorist, for the media ordered us so.