Damn you war, Bitcoin has fallen because of you. Why is it always the good ones that go first? Whyyyyyy?

As you can probably tell I'm trying to start this one off with a bit of humor since there actually isn't much of it nowadays. And it's not as if the claim that Bitcoin would be in the 100-to 300K range if not for the global unrest is wrong or anything. I mean it's not factually wrong, it's just wrong on every other level.

"The problem with that is, right now, there are some crazy things happening all over the world, which are not connected to technology, but they will have an effect on the markets....global instability and cataclysmic events could shift people's priorities away from investing in cryptocurrencies." Well that's one way to put it. Another would be "Who in the fluke would think about Bitcoin or investing in general as they are leaving all their worldly possessions behind"?

I don't have the statistics on it, but considering we have Palestine, Ukraine, Libya, Ethiopia, Syria, Myanmar, Congo, Nagorno-Karabakh, Sudan and many others, I think we are today close to having the most displaced number of people around the world since WW2. And yes, don't ever underestimate people's greed and carelessness for other people's misfortune. I strongly believe they are getting a head start on assets like Bitcoin now while others are barely able to afford rent or have their homes collapse on top of them.

Speaking of which, I just can't get over the numbers there. +8000 children killed in two months? That's an insanely high number, but along with the fact that in these same two months record number of UN staff and journalists have been killed as well, we can not conclude anything other than the undeniable fact that I must be a Jew hating antisemite.😂

Seriously though, if that's what you base your whole narrative on, you might not be the debating champion you praised yourself to be.

Speaking of which, I think it's worth mentioning that this mans was the first person in human history to lose a debate against someone who wasn't even trying to debate him.😂😂😂

But getting back OT: "JB suggested that a massive surge in bitcoin's price might not be favorable for traditional banking systems. He explained that such a spike could disrupt the balance of wealth and potentially pose challenges to central finance." Wasn't that the whole point? I don't get it, why mention this now as if it's some great revelation or something?

It ends with the notion that if you're interest is solely money, with Bitcoin in these times you will get what you want. Which may very well be the case, 35K is a long shot from the 68K height Bitcoin has seen and those were in times an ETF seemed lightyears away. I also see a lot of people make insane predictions like a 1 million Dollar Bitcoin and give non-advice on how much you should get now in order to be rich then, which if the path continues the way it did is not impossible or anything but jeesh, calm down man. Let's get to ATH first, past the 100K, survive some crashes and see if the price holds up at those levels before we start calculating how much your Sats will be worth at the hypothetical 1 million mark.💸