Should I have just dropped every Epstein file regarding Bitcoin without further comment? Maybe, especially since I am still not 100% convinced what it is about, so if that's what you want scroll down to the picture of his portrait and his 2 most high profile accomplices and just click on the link and search for "Bitcoin" and "Bit coin" as it was often misspelled.
But here's my take so far: Numerous pages of emails and articles about Bitcoin appear and if you've read most of them a pattern would emerge.
That pattern is the name and one of the original 6 BTC developers Gavin Andresen (sometimes misspelled as Andressen or even Andr=sen). Now I'm not saying this Bitcoin developer was mentioned in the files "like that", but he was mentioned in them quite a bit along with Patrick Murck and Amir Taaki, this went as far back as 2011 at a time Bitcoin was about 100 Euro.
Quick summary of Gavin Andresen: One of the lead BTC developers, later on created The Bitcoin Faucet and then sort of drifted away and said BCH was the way to go. Got his BTC Github access revoked for saying Craig Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto. He later on said he regretted that statement and wished he didn't get involved in the "who is Satoshi" game.
OK, now we got that out the way: Early communication reveals they were very interested in Bitcoin, but not for the old "child p****" claim many associate Bitcoin with. No Epstein's interest in Bitcoin was believe it or not far more bizarre.
It wouldn't be long before he started to discuss "the next Bitcoin" with people as early as 2013.
I couldn't find anything yet that proves his involvement in the creation of any EXISTING cryptos, and I typed that in capital letters for a soon to be revealed reason, but they didn't speak too highly of Ethereum and XLM. They even went as far to praise ZCASH (back then zerocash) as the deserved 2nd best ranking crypto after Bitcoin. Which if you'd knew anything about ZCASH would already call total 🐶💩. But in all honesty the sanboxing (isolated executable running without contamination risks) theory does hold some water. But still...
In here they were basically saying how they were in contact with BTC developers to try and get their stories straight on what Bitcoin exactly is in order to pass regulations and options trading. Again, so far nothing related to Epstein's "main activity" but basically for their own financial interest and control.
Then there was this part of course in the earlier released files how they "used gift funds" and "took control" of 3 of the main BTC developers when the Bitcoin foundation ran dry. What did they have them do? IDK exactly. It's a bit murky with still a lot of data, but here's what I did find: Sharia coin.
This is going to sound absolutely crazy and rather racist/stereotypical so I'm going to just say that this is by no means related to any religion or race or whatever. These people represent nothing but themselves. But basically, a jew p3dophile was using his recruited BTC developers to try and create an Islamic crypto. There I said it and yes that really happened.
Now, we all know how that sounds right? Well so did they, that's why their strategy was to control it in the background and use their Arab puppets in the UAE as the front man. I mean, what muslim would take any "sharia crypto" serious if he'd knew it was controlled by a jewish financier?🤣
That's pretty much it. They aren't disclosing who "sharia guy" eventually was or if the project ever took place. But we did get "Islamic coin" from that same UAE.🥲🇦🇪
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/search
PS Completely unrelated, but I felt the need to tell someone because this here was by far the most disturbing part of the list:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02731361.pdf
