Terrifying definitions we have read about how bitcoin can be considered; an instrument lacking financial confidence, a definition that most critical "experts" in economic matters emphasize.

And it is that in this spaceship that we all inhabit, we must be clear about one thing, the imminent scenario to which these wonderful experts took us; a scenario that is difficult to bear in letters and that the most successful would be words such as reception and depression. This image only increases two things, the first the distrust that people have towards their government representatives and their concept of safeguarding businessmen first and then the people, a well-studied cantillon effect; the second, it is increasingly feasible to consider the BTC as a protection element capable of generating liquidity in adverse scenarios to personal finances.

In the words of Adam Back, a cryptographer and that for many a possible Satochi Nakamoto, the BTC comes to change paradigms due to the distrust of a centralized system that only uses money printing to safeguard a class that does not measure the consequences of marked actions by disasters without presedents.

Only in BTC, and in cryptocurrencies will a true decentralized and opportune path be seen for financial freedom, a better position when making decisions that help improve our way of life and not depend on a debt role in the present to generate a debt of money that we do not have in the future, generating an endless cycle and in which there is no way out.

There are many soap bubbles, as well as the title of this writing, that explode for being fragile in financial alterations, but nothing so far from reality when considering BTC as such.

I continue to insist that we are on the right path in history, a path of a digital nature, with mathematical roots that strives to excel and win people's trust is vital, but that the role that countries represent does not allow growth. We are already in a better position to demand changes that little by little will be inevitable.