Good day everyone,
I hope you are all well and having a wonderful day, welcome to CryptoGod-1's blog on all things crypto. Today I am going to doing an article focusing on Caroline Ellison having previously looked mainly at Sam Bankman-Fried from their roles in the FTX collapse.
Who is Caroline Ellison?
Having come into the spotlight after the FTX collapse in November 2022, Caroline Ellison gained attention as the CEO of Alameda Research, a sister company of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX. She was born in 1994 and is an American business executive and quantitative trader. Her parents are both economics professors at MIT and she graduated from Stanford University in 2016 with a bachelor's degree in mathematics. She met Bankman-Fried at the trading firm Jane Street Capital, and the pair embraced the philosophy of "effective altruism," which involves making large sums of money to fund philanthropic pursuits that benefit society to the greatest extent possible.
In December 2022, Ellison pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud, two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. She is known to be cooperating with the police as part of their investigation into the FTX collapse and in its bankruptcy proceedings against Sam Bankman-Fried. A transcript of her plea hearing was unsealed on December 23, revealing she had admitted to judge Ronnie Abrams that she and others conspired to steal billions of dollars from customers of FTX, while misleading its investors and lenders.
Negative Margin Position but rewarded $6m
Back when the fallout of FTX was coming to light, one of the more interesting things to note was the fact Caroline Ellison had been in a negative margin position of around $1.31 billion back in May 2022. This was brought to light when Sam Bankman-Fried brought it to light that he was no longer running Alameda, and instead it was all under the control of Caroline Ellison. He also claimed to have no prior knowledge of he 'size of her position' and that when auditors looked at FTX’s corporate financials, they neglected to look at customer positions or customer risks. In other words, Bankman-Fried was throwing the blame in Caroline's direction for the substantial amount of loss she had incurred, claiming her funds from FTX were included as a customers position and therefore not picked up. However, we are more aware since then of the real goings on, including how FTX had been bridging loans and funds from real customers accounts to cover the losses of Alameda, especially once the downturn came in the market in 2022.
That position is being blamed as one of the biggest reasons why FTX ended up in such a dangerous position, with it having grown to such a state that according to Bankman-Fried it "was not going to be closable in a liquid way in order to make good on its obligations.” It was too big to be manageable during the ongoing liquidity crisis while also endangered the ability to deliver feedback on customer trades. Caroline Ellison not only was aware of have substantial her negative position was, she was also quite happy to inform those around her about it. At one point she is reported to have shared this data among a number of FTX staff members when she was experiencing a technical glitch with her personal trading account, meaning they were in the know regarding how deep in the deep her position had become.
Below is an alleged screenshot of Caroline Ellison's negative margin position in May 2022.
The sheer level of being about $1.31 billion in a negative position is staggering, but according to reports FFTX had shown negative balances in all accounts. Many of these were down to 'final settlement' matters such as if a user has a negative balance for specific reasons such as that a payment wasn’t settled or the user was in debt from margin positions. This apparently was one of the main reasons why the auditors failed to pick up on the staggering position held by Alameda, according to Bankman-Fried.
Documents showed that Caroline Ellison, while running Alameda Research, and as part of her negative balance she apparently had held positions in:
- FTT
- Megaserum (MSRM),
- Locked Megaserum (MSRM)
- Locked Serum (SRM)
- Locked Maps (MAPS)
- Solana (SOL)
- Ethereum (ETH)
- Millions of dollars in stablecoins.
Caroline Ellison pleaded guilty to her eights charges back on the 21st of December 2022 and had been facing up to 110 years in prison before she agreed to cooperate with the federal government. Her charges include:
- two counts of wire fraud
- two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud
- conspiracy to commit commodities fraud
- conspiracy to commit securities fraud
- conspiracy to commit money laundering.
She was released on a $250,000 bail as part of the agreement, a bail sum which is 1,000 times less than that of Bankman-Fried. Further news has emerged that she apparently received $6 million from the crypto-trading firm as part of the 'personal loans and payments' which had been given out to Bankman-Fried and his close associates. bankman-Fried in contrast is reported to have received about $2.2 Billion into his personal account from the company. It is interesting to note that Caroline Ellison was Alameda Research's one and only female executive, and that she received about 75% less in payments than her male counterparts. Among the other payments were:
- $587 million went to Nishad Singh - FTX former director of engineering
- $246 million went to Zixiao "Gary" Wang - FTX cofounder
- $87 million went to Ryan Salame
- $25 million went to John Samuel Trabucco - Co-CEO at Alameda Research
- $1 million went to Joseph Bankman - Sam Bankman-Fried's father
Included within these sums were parts of the millions which the politicians received as donations, with Bankman-Fried being well known as the Democrats' second-top donor ahead of the 2022 midterms. Along with this Salame and Singh are also reported to have donated million to the election campaigns. However, it has been alleged that the donations from both Singh and Salame were actually Bankman-Fried's doing, but he did not wish to be known as a partisan and therefore instructed his executives to donate the money to specific candidates.
Salame and Singh
Possibly one of the more interesting figures is the $25 million to John Samuel Trabucco, Ellison's co-CEO. He stepped down from his position in August 2022, likely aware of the incoming implosion within the organisation, but he did purchase property for in and around $10 million along with a 52-foot yacht. This was confirmed via a court document which showed his transfer of $2.5 million from Alameda to the American Yacht Group in March 2022, with the cited reason "for the benefit of John Samuel Trabucco."
John Samuel Trabucco
It is fascinating how Caroline Ellison was aid a sum closer to that of Bankman-Fried's father, who was also given a $41,665 salary from West Realm Shires Services, the company behind FTX US, than some of the other executives within the FTX and Alameda groups. While her actions still inexcusable, it sheds a level of scrutiny and light upon the potential levels of value Bankman-Fried placed on the men within his organisations compared to their female counterparts. At the same time one has to consider the fact she had a negative margin position to such an extent that it was inevitable that her actions would come back to bite the business.
Closing Thoughts on Caroline Ellison
Its quite difficult to feel anything bar disdain and contempt for Caroline Ellison. She was born into a very well off family with plenty of opportunities set out before her that many of us never had. Even those of us who did have excellent opportunities could never claim to have had the ones she was given. So what did she do? Went wild and crazy. Caroline is known to have talked about “regular amphetamine use” in an April 2021 Twitter thread, which was about a year and a half before FTX and Alameda Research went under. While I understand people need a release from the mundane of everyday life, if you are burning through $1.3 Billion then maybe amphetamine's are not the solution. That's before even mentioning the 'living situation' all these executives had in the Bahamas.
Caroline never portrayed herself as a leadership type character, and that became her biggest undoing in the end. Some might think she was singled out as a scapegoat for being a woman, which would make sense when looking at the financial benefits the men received compared to her, however that is the easy option and clearly not the case here. She made bad decision after bad decision and although she is cooperating with the police in the investigation, she should still be forced to face the music.
I will leave you with the interview she gave to the El Momento Podcast, where Caroline Ellison discussed crypto, trading, and demonstrated exactly why nobody, ever, should have put any faith or trust in her to oversee a multi billion dollar operation.
Have a great day.
Peace. CryptoGod-1.
Referral Links and Follow Me:
