You are reading an excerpt from our free but shortened abridged report! While still packed with incredible research and data, for just $40/month you can upgrade to our FULL library of 60+ reports (including this one) and complete industry-leading analysis on the top crypto assets. 

Becoming a Premium member means enjoying all the perks of a Basic membership PLUS:

• Full-length CORE Reports: More technical, in-depth research, actionable insights, and potential market alpha for serious crypto users
• Early access to future CORE ratings: Being early is sometimes just as important as being right!
• Premium Member CORE+ Reports: Coverage on the top issues pertaining to crypto users like bridge security, layer two solutions, DeFi plays, and more
• CORE report Audio playback: Don’t want to read? No problem! Listen on the go.

Intro

Aave has recently announced its forthcoming fourth iteration (V4) as a part of its extensive Aave 2030 roadmap, which promises significant architectural enhancements aimed at refining its protocol. Key improvements in V4 include a unified liquidity layer to broaden borrowing options, the introduction of fuzzy interest rates to shift control from governance to dynamic rate curves, and liquidity premiums that adjust borrowing rates according to the collateral makeup. Additionally, V4 is set to enhance the functionality of its GHO stablecoin alongside advancements in risk management and liquidation mechanisms.

The tentative launch for Aave V4 is slated for the second quarter of 2025. This announcement, along with similar updates from leading decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols such as Uniswap and Maker, suggests a trend towards maturation in core functionalities of DeFi entities. They maintain market dominance and continue to innovate, potentially setting a benchmark for emerging protocols in areas like decentralization, sustained token utility, and phased feature releases.

Developing expanded functionalities in DeFi protocols is technologically intricate, contrasting with the agile development approaches of traditional consumer-facing web2 companies. DeFi entities like Aave seldom revise their original architectures in a manner transparent to end-users. Instead, they typically introduce new versions and incentivize users to migrate liquidity—a process that is not straightforward and demands proactive user participation. For instance, it wasn't until a year after its release that Aave V3 surpassed its predecessor in total value locked (TVL), highlighting a cautious approach to liquidity migration within the community.

This gradual transition underscores the significance of the Lindy effect within the DeFi markets, where longevity and a history free of exploits often garner more trust than innovative but untested functionalities. The adversarial nature of decentralized technology underscores that time-tested security often trumps theoretical safety assurances such as audits. This phenomenon underscores the unique challenges of smart contract immutability and the financial stakes inherent in web3 products, where there is little room for error amid rapid innovation. Consequently, the adoption cycle of crypto products may evolve differently compared to traditional web2 markets, given the severe ramifications of a web3 financial exploit compared to a web2 data breach, which generally does not disrupt core application functionalities.

Moreover, the Aave 2030 roadmap suggests an impending rivalry with Maker’s Endgame plan, especially with its concentrated efforts on its GHO stablecoin. Aave 2030 features plans for an Aave-specific network, a cross-chain liquidity layer for GHO, improved integration of real-world assets, and revamped protocol branding—elements that mirror the strategic vision of Maker's Endgame. Although Aave and Maker are major players in the DeFi lending arena, with TVLs of $10.5 billion and $8.2 billion, respectively, the scope of their offerings differs significantly. While Maker restricts borrowers to its DAI stablecoin, Aave offers a broader range of borrowable assets beyond GHO. 

These developments highlight a strategic pivot towards decentralized stablecoins at a time when interest in such assets appears to be waning compared to centralized counterparts like USDC. As both Aave and Maker continue to refine their visions and roll out comprehensive long-term strategies, their impacts might be overshadowed in the short term by broader economic factors that currently dominate market attention. However, these advancements are pivotal in shaping the trajectory of DeFi protocols and could significantly influence the landscape of digital finance in the coming years.