You are reading an excerpt from our free but shortened abridged report! While still packed with incredible research and data, for just $20/month you can upgrade to our FULL library of 50+ reports (including this one) and complete industry-leading analysis on the top crypto assets. 

Becoming a Premium member means enjoying all the perks of a Basic membership PLUS:

• Full-length CORE Reports: More technical, in-depth research, actionable insights, and potential market alpha for serious crypto users
• Early access to future CORE ratings: Being early is sometimes just as important as being right!
• Premium Member CORE+ Reports: Coverage on the top issues pertaining to crypto users like bridge security, layer two solutions, DeFi plays, and more
• CORE report Audio playback: Don’t want to read? No problem! Listen on the go.

Bitcoin Mining

Proof-of-Work (POW) mining remains at the crux of many debates, primarily because of its vast electricity consumption. Governments worldwide express concern not just from an environmental perspective, but also regarding the regulations needed to govern this complex realm. Among the various projects that utilize POW consensus, Bitcoin stands out as the most notable.

In recent years, two pivotal factors have significantly influenced the trajectory of Bitcoin mining:

1. Governmental Policies: Governments, with their regulatory might, have played a dual role. Some have championed Bitcoin mining by offering incentives or providing a conducive regulatory environment, while others have imposed restrictions or outright bans, concerned about environmental impacts or potential financial system disruptions.

2. Power Grid Restructuring: The energy infrastructure in numerous countries has undergone transformations, either due to attempts to incorporate renewable energy sources or because of aging infrastructure needing upgrades. These changes often directly impact the cost and availability of electricity for miners, influencing where mining operations are viable.

Dominance in the Mining Sector

As per the HashRate Index, a concentrated group dominates Bitcoin mining. The four paramount mining pools - Foundry USA, AntPool, F2Pool, and "unknown" - command over 70% of the hashpower. Such dominance raises questions about the decentralization ethos of the Bitcoin network.

Source

Efficiency and Profitability: A Balancing Act

Bitcoin mining's efficiency is a dance between three primary elements:

1. Hashpower: This is the computational power miners use to solve complex mathematical problems and validate transactions.
2. Level of Difficulty: As more miners join the network, the difficulty of these mathematical problems increases, ensuring block creation remains consistent.
3. Bitcoin's Price: A higher Bitcoin price can justify more significant electricity expenditure, making mining profitable even as difficulty increases.

Source

BTC Mining Profitability

Bitcoin mining profitability is dependent on the price of Bitcoin, the total network hashrate, and to a lesser extent transaction fees (so far). The second component in this profitability calculation, network hashrate, is dependent on other miners’ decisions to run their machines or turn them off. As a result, projections of miner profitability must be iterative, and the problem lends itself well to agent-based modeling.

Why run a mining operation when you can purchase coins on the open market?

This is the most common reaction when someone first hears about mining. It’s no secret that it was the outsize financial return that spurred the initial interest in mining and accelerated its growth into a billion-dollar behemoth. A successful miner is able to produce Bitcoin at a cost lower than the spot price, and can accordingly build a position at a steep discount compared to purchasing on the open market. 

However, the low cost of production is by no means permanent. Over the years, competition has been heating up, and the market cycle is becoming too obscure to predict. The “discount” that the miners have gotten so spoiled with can deteriorate into painful loss at any moment. In today’s market, is mining still more profitable than purchasing on the open market? Given the number of variables involved, it’s difficult to simply answer "yes" or "no."

In practice, miners are not tied to a specific modus operandi for the entire mining period. They have the flexibility to change their strategy whenever they think the market trend is shifting. In addition, they can complement mining with trading strategies, or lend out the coins to enhance the yields on the inventory. For instance, the miner can sell and capture profits on days mining profit exceeds cost-of-production, and buy coins on the open market on days mining profit is lower than cost-of-production. Using the right combination of strategies during different stages of the mining cycle has a significant impact on the outcome. The purpose of this exercise is not to come up with a generalized winning strategy, or to prove mining is strictly better than purchasing coins, but to illustrate that managing a mining operation is essentially managing a portfolio.

At-home Mining

At first glance, it may seem that institutional miners hold all the cards. With ready access to state-of-the-art hardware and affordable power, they operate at an advantage. This disparity often means that retail miners, working with less cutting-edge machinery and facing residential electricity rates, must resort to bespoke solutions like custom firmware to enhance revenue.

Yet, while profitability is undeniably a core motivator, retail miners frequently exhibit a multifaceted rationale behind their operations. Even when faced with diminishing returns due to fluctuating Bitcoin prices or reduced mining revenues, numerous non-monetary drivers keep these individuals steadfast in the mining realm.

Unearthing the Non-Monetary Motivations of Retail Miners

1. Privacy Concerns: In today's digital age, anonymity has become a sought-after luxury. Retail miners cherish the flow of unidentified satoshis earned through mining. For those prioritizing discretion, mining Bitcoin in the comfort of their homes offers an enticing alternative to traditional exchange-based acquisitions. This narrative of privacy is further bolstered by resourceful contributors to the cryptocurrency community, such as Diverter and Econoalchemist, who have curated an array of informative articles underscoring the privacy merits of mining.

2. The Allure of Uncertainty: Interestingly, an element of risk, akin to gambling, finds favor among some miners. Termed 'solo mining', this strategy is reminiscent of a lottery system. Here, miners attempt to solve blocks outside established mining pools, banking on the slim chance of bagging the entire block reward. Despite the astronomical odds and associated electricity costs, these miners persist, powered by the thrill of the gamble.

3. Pure Enthusiasm: In any domain, there are purists, and cryptocurrency mining is no exception. A subset of retail miners, driven by passion, engage in mining to support the network's transaction processing. Analogous to individuals operating full, non-mining Bitcoin nodes, these miners shun economic incentives, choosing to contribute to the network for the sheer joy and belief in the cause.

4. Innovative Utility: The physicality of the mining process, particularly the heat produced, has birthed innovative applications. Enterprising retail miners are channeling this heat for myriad purposes, ranging from warming swimming pools to aiding food dehydration. As an added benefit, mining rewards offset the energy expenses typically linked to these activities. Thus, even in instances of mining at a loss, the resultant satoshi rewards alleviate net electricity expenditures.