Not All Stablecoins Are Created Equal: Part 1

By Michael @ CryptoEQ | CryptoEQ | 8 Feb 2024

You are reading an excerpt from our free but shortened abridged report! While still packed with incredible research and data, for just $20/month you can upgrade to our FULL library of 60+ reports (including this one) and complete industry-leading analysis on the top crypto assets. 


Becoming a Premium member means enjoying all the perks of a Basic membership PLUS:

  • Full-length CORE Reports: More technical, in-depth research, actionable insights, and potential market alpha for serious crypto users
  • Early access to future CORE ratings: Being early is sometimes just as important as being right!
  • Premium Member CORE+ Reports: Coverage on the top issues pertaining to crypto users like bridge security, layer two solutions, DeFi plays, and more
  • CORE report Audio playback: Don’t want to read? No problem! Listen on the go.


Introduction to Blockchain Stablecoins

The financial world is changing with the rise of blockchain stablecoins and digital alternatives to traditional currencies. Decentralized stablecoins like DAI, LUSD, and FRAX are leading this shift and have become dominant players in the market. These digital currencies are designed to have a stable value tied to a specific fiat currency, such as the US Dollar, making them attractive to investors looking for stability in the volatile crypto markets.

Blockchain technology provides the perfect foundation for creating and managing these digital assets because of its transparency and security features. It ensures that transactions are recorded on a public ledger that can be verified by anyone, preventing fraud and manipulation.

Challenges Faced by Dominant Stablecoins

While decentralized stablecoins have gained popularity, there are concerns about whether they can maintain their position as new competitors and innovations emerge. Two notable players entering the space are Aave and Curve, who plan to launch their own blockchain stablecoins. They hope to use their existing user base and introduce unique features that could challenge the dominance of DAI, LUSD, and FRAX.

Another aspect fueling discussions is the viability of non-CDP designs as contenders against established stablecoin giants. These designs propose alternative methods of maintaining price stability without relying on over-collateralization, which has been a common criticism of current models.

Key Factors for the Success of Blockchain Stablecoins

Several factors determine whether a blockchain stablecoin will succeed:

  1. Price Stability: The ability to maintain a steady value over time.
  2. Scalability: The capacity to handle a large number of transactions quickly and efficiently.
  3. Usability: How easy it is for people to use the stablecoin in their everyday transactions.
  4. Regulatory Compliance: Adherence to relevant laws and regulations governing financial activities.
  5. Technological Innovation: Continual improvement and adaptation to new developments in blockchain technology.
  6. Community Trust: The level of confidence users have in the stablecoin and its issuing platform.
  7. Integration with Cryptocurrency Ecosystems: Seamless interaction with other cryptocurrencies and decentralized applications.

Stablecoin Taxonomy (excluding fiat-backed stables)

The taxonomy of blockchain stablecoins encompasses a diverse array of protocols, each with unique mechanisms designed for stability and efficiency in the trustless environment of decentralized finance. Here are some notable examples:

1. Maker DAO's DAI

  • Pioneering decentralized stablecoin
  • Pegged to the US dollar
  • Backed by collateral in the form of various cryptocurrencies
  • Users lock assets into Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) to generate DAI, ensuring its value remains anchored.

2. Liquity's LUSD

  • Provides interest-free loans against Ethereum collateral
  • Maintains stability through a redemption mechanism that ensures LUSD can be exchanged for the underlying ETH at face value.
  • Designed to keep LUSD closely tied to its target price.

3. Frax

  • First fractional-algorithmic stablecoin
  • Deploys a dynamic collateralization model
  • Combines algorithmic market operations with collateral backing
  • Allows for an adjustable ratio based on market conditions to maintain its peg to the dollar.

4. Aave's GHO stablecoin proposal

  • Leverages Aave's established lending platform to issue a decentralized stablecoin
  • Benefits from Aave's network effects and liquidity pools.

5. Curve's crvUSD

  • Employs a specialized automated market maker (AMM) designed for high efficiency in swap transactions.

6. Gyroscope

  • Aims to mitigate systemic risks with its fully-backed stablecoin model
  • Limits reliance on single oracle feeds
  • Diversifies reserve assets to prevent co-option by any one particular asset class.

7. UXD Protocol

  • Powered by Solana
  • Aims to maintain its peg through a combination of algorithmic processes and yield-generating strategies
  • Does not rely on external collateral.

As these platforms evolve within the blockchain ecosystem, they collectively contribute to the robust architecture supporting trustless stablecoin scaling—a valuable asset for any crypto protocol looking to facilitate mainstream adoption.

Advantages of On-chain Stablecoins

The rise of on-chain stablecoins is reshaping the cryptocurrency landscape by providing critical credit innovations and efficiencies that challenge the dominance of fiat-backed stablecoins. These digital assets are poised to transform the way users interact with DeFi platforms, offering stability and trust in a space often characterized by volatility.

Gain insights and tools for cryptocurrency investing from CryptoEQ.

Challenges and Success Factors for Decentralized Stablecoins

Challenges in the Decentralized Stablecoin Landscape

  1. Competition from Fiat-Backed Stablecoins: Established players like DAI, LUSD, and FRAX face tough competition as on-chain stablecoins gain popularity.
  2. Imbalance between Demand and Collateral Supply: The current demand for on-chain stablecoins is higher than the available collateral supply, posing a challenge to their growth.
  3. Threat from Non-Collateralized Debt Position Designs: Innovative designs like non-CDPs are challenging the traditional over-collateralization model used by giants like DAI, LUSD, and FRAX.

Success Factors for Decentralized Stablecoins

  1. Efficiency Improvements: On-chain solutions like Aave's GHO and Curve's crvUSD offer increased efficiency through network effects and automated market makers.
  2. Strategic Initiatives by Platforms: MakerDAO is leading the way with initiatives like regulatory arbitrage and exploring real-world assets as collateral.
  3. Expansion of Stablecoin Offerings: Aave and Curve have plans to develop their own stablecoin offerings, creating more competition in the market.

In order to thrive in this competitive landscape, decentralized stablecoins will need to address the challenges they face while taking advantage of new opportunities that arise.

How do you rate this article?


Michael @ CryptoEQ
Michael @ CryptoEQ

I am a Co-Founder and Lead Analyst at CryptoEQ. Gain the market insights you need to grow your cryptocurrency portfolio. Our team's supportive and interactive approach helps you refine your crypto investing and trading strategies.


Gain the market insights you need to grow your cryptocurrency portfolio. Our team's supportive and interactive approach helps you refine your crypto investing and trading strategies.

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.