You are reading an excerpt from our free but shortened abridged report! While still packed with incredible research and data, for just $20/month you can upgrade to our FULL library of 50+ reports (including this one) and complete industry-leading analysis on the top crypto assets.
Becoming a Premium member means enjoying all the perks of a Basic membership PLUS:
- Full-length CORE Reports: More technical, in-depth research, actionable insights, and potential market alpha for serious crypto users
- Early access to future CORE ratings: Being early is sometimes just as important as being right!
- Premium Member CORE+ Reports: Coverage on the top issues pertaining to crypto users like bridge security, layer two solutions, DeFi plays, and more
- CORE report Audio playback: Don’t want to read? No problem! Listen on the go.
Last week, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that the rules governing traditional exchanges would also apply to decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. The proposal aims to clarify that current exchange regulations also apply to decentralized cryptocurrency platforms. SEC Chair Gary Gensler made a strong statement, asserting that many crypto trading platforms already fall under the existing definition of an exchange and are thus obligated to comply with securities laws. Gensler added that these platforms seem to be acting as if compliance is optional, which is not the case.
The SEC decided to gather additional public input through a 3-2 vote after receiving criticism from crypto firms. Many argued that the proposal is ambiguous and targets decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, which would not typically fall under the regulator's purview.
This move by the SEC is not new or sudden; it has been in the works since last year. While there has been no change in the rules themselves, the SEC has made a deliberate effort to clarify that traditional exchange regulations apply to DeFi platforms as well. The proposal, initially introduced in January 2022, seeks to extend the definition of an exchange to encompass platforms utilizing "communication protocols," including request-for-quote systems. If implemented, this change is expected to bring a wider range of venues under regulatory control, beyond the conventional exchanges that facilitate transactions between multiple buyers and sellers.
Initially aimed at Treasury markets and other government securities marketplaces, the proposal sought to address situations where inter-dealer crypto brokers operated like exchanges without proper registration. However, crypto firms resisted the plan amid escalating tensions with the regulator, asserting that existing securities regulations are ill-suited for the industry and that new rules are necessary.
The decision has been met with mixed reactions, and even SEC Commissioner Hester Pierce has publicly criticized it.
The SEC has opened a 30-day comment period to gather public opinion on the matter. A vote will be held to finalize the proposed clarification and amendments to the definition of an "exchange," which is expected to pass. The ongoing crypto regulatory debate has always had an ideological aspect. Cryptocurrency is a controversial technology by nature, and there will always be differing views on its regulation.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for crypto builders to hedge their regulatory risks. If possible, they should consider building outside of the US and targeting other markets that can help them achieve revenue or even profitability as soon as possible. Launching a token should only be considered if there is a valid reason for doing so.
As the debate around cryptocurrency regulation in the United States continues, it is vital for industry participants to understand the implications of the SEC's stance and adapt accordingly. Both large and small investors should work together to help shape a more favorable regulatory environment for the future of the crypto industry.
